Measuring the teamwork performance of teams in crisis situations: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties

被引:53
作者
Boet, Sylvain [1 ]
Etherington, Nicole [2 ]
Larrigan, Sarah [3 ]
Yin, Li [3 ]
Khan, Hira [4 ]
Sullivan, Katrina [2 ]
Jung, James J. [5 ]
Grantcharov, Teodor P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Carleton Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Fac Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] St Michaels Hosp, Div Gen Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; NONTECHNICAL SKILLS; SIMULATED TRAUMA; COGNITIVE AIDS; NOTECHS SCALE; EMERGENCY; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008260
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Educational interventions to improve teamwork in crisis situations have proliferated in recent years with substantial variation in teamwork measurement. This systematic review aimed to synthesise available tools and their measurement properties in order to identify the most robust tool for measuring the teamwork performance of teams in crisis situations. Methods Searches were conducted in Embase (via OVID), PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Resources Information Center, Medline and Medline In-Process (via OVID) (through 12 January 2017). Studies evaluating the measurement properties of teamwork assessment tools for teams in clinical or simulated crisis situations were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predetermined criteria and completed data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results The search yielded 1822 references. Twenty studies were included, representing 13 assessment tools. Tools were primarily assessed in simulated resuscitation scenarios for emergency department teams. The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) had the most validation studies (n=5), which demonstrated three sources of validity (content, construct and concurrent) and three sources of reliability (internal consistency, interrater reliability and test-retest reliability). Most studies of TEAM's measurement properties were at no risk of bias. Conclusions A number of tools are available for assessing teamwork performance of teams in crisis situations. Although selection will ultimately depend on the user's context, TEAM may be the most promising tool given its measurement evidence. Currently, there is a lack of tools to assess teamwork performance during intraoperative crisis situations. Additional research is needed in this regard.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 337
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Development of a formative assessment tool for measurement of performance in multi-professional resuscitation teams
    Andersen, Peter Oluf
    Jensen, Michael Kammer
    Lippert, Anne
    Ostergaard, Doris
    Klausen, Tobias Wirenfelt
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2010, 81 (06) : 703 - 711
  • [2] [Anonymous], RESUSCITATION
  • [3] [Anonymous], TECHNICAL NONTECHNIC
  • [4] [Anonymous], TEAM BEHAV TRAUMA RE
  • [5] [Anonymous], CAN PAT SAF I
  • [6] [Anonymous], IMPROVING NONTECHNIC
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, SURG RES PRACT
  • [8] [Anonymous], NAM PERSPECTIVES
  • [9] [Anonymous], MED TEAMWORK PATIENT
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1995, ED MEAS ISSUES PRACT, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1995.TB00881.X