Happy you, happy me: expressive changes on a stranger's voice recruit faster implicit processes than self-produced expressions

被引:6
作者
Rachman, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Dubal, Stephanie [1 ]
Aucouturier, Jean-Julien [2 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, Inst Cerveau & Moelle Epiniere,UMR S 1127, Social & Affect Neurosci Lab,Inserm,UMR 7225,U 11, Paris, France
[2] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, IRCAM, Sci & Technol Mus & Sound,UMR 9912, F-75004 Paris, France
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
event-related potentials; mismatch negativity; self-voice; other-voice; algorithmic voice transformations; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; SEX-DIFFERENCES; MOTOR SYSTEM; RESPONSES; ERP; RECOGNITION; FAMILIARITY; PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsz030
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In social interactions, people have to pay attention both to the what' and who'. In particular, expressive changes heard on speech signals have to be integrated with speaker identity, differentiating e.g. self- and other-produced signals. While previous research has shown that self-related visual information processing is facilitated compared to non-self stimuli, evidence in the auditory modality remains mixed. Here, we compared electroencephalography (EEG) responses to expressive changes in sequence of self- or other-produced speech sounds using a mismatch negativity (MMN) passive oddball paradigm. Critically, to control for speaker differences, we used programmable acoustic transformations to create voice deviants that differed from standards in exactly the same manner, making EEG responses to such deviations comparable between sequences. Our results indicate that expressive changes on a stranger's voice are highly prioritized in auditory processing compared to identical changes on the self-voice. Other-voice deviants generate earlier MMN onset responses and involve stronger cortical activations in a left motor and somatosensory network suggestive of an increased recruitment of resources for less internally predictable, and therefore perhaps more socially relevant, signals.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 568
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ISMIR
[2]   The free-energy self: A predictive coding account of self-recognition [J].
Apps, Matthew A. J. ;
Tsakiris, Manos .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2014, 41 :85-97
[3]   Perception of Loudness Is Influenced by Emotion [J].
Asutay, Erkin ;
Vastfjaill, Daniel .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (06)
[4]   Covert digital manipulation of vocal emotion alter speakers' emotional states in a congruent direction [J].
Aucouturier, Jean-Julien ;
Johansson, Petter ;
Hall, Lars ;
Segnini, Rodrigo ;
Mercadie, Lolita ;
Watanabe, Katsumi .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (04) :948-953
[5]   The impact of personal relevance on emotion processing: evidence from event-related potentials and pupillary responses [J].
Bayer, Mareike ;
Ruthmann, Katja ;
Schacht, Annekathrin .
SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 12 (09) :1470-1479
[6]   Electrophysiological markers of voice familiarity [J].
Beauchemin, Maude ;
De Beaumont, Louis ;
Vannasing, Phetsamone ;
Turcotte, Aline ;
Arcand, Claudine ;
Belin, Pascal ;
Lassonde, Maryse .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 23 (11) :3081-3086
[7]   Thinking the voice:: neural correlates of voice perception [J].
Belin, P ;
Fecteau, S ;
Bédard, C .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (03) :129-135
[8]   Discrimination of emotional facial expressions in a visual oddball task: an ERP study [J].
Campanella, S ;
Gaspard, C ;
Debatisse, D ;
Bruyer, R ;
Crommelinck, M ;
Guerit, JM .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 59 (03) :171-186
[9]   Who is speaking? Implicit and explicit self and other voice recognition [J].
Candini, Michela ;
Zamagni, Elisa ;
Nuzzo, Angela ;
Ruotolo, Francesco ;
Iachini, Tina ;
Frassinetti, Francesca .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2014, 92 :112-117
[10]   Neurophysiological differentiation between preattentive and attentive processing of emotional expressions on French vowels [J].
Carminati, Mathilde ;
Fiori-Duharcourt, Nicole ;
Isel, Frederic .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 132 :55-63