How Will COVID-19 Impact on the Governance of Global Health in the 2030 Agenda Framework? The Opinion of Experts

被引:10
作者
Fernandez-Portillo, Luis A. [1 ]
Sianes, Antonio [2 ]
Santos-Carrillo, Francisco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loyola Andalucia, Dept Business Management, Cordoba 14004, Spain
[2] Univ Loyola Andalucia, Res Inst Policies Social Transformat, Cordoba 14004, Spain
[3] Univ Loyola Andalucia, Dept Int Studies, Cordoba 14004, Spain
关键词
Global Health; public health systems; 2030; agenda; sustainable development goals; COVID-19; institutional design; content analysis; NVIVO; THINK TANKS; PRIORITY; IDEAS;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare8040356
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2015, the 2030 Agenda was formally adopted by the United Nations, establishing a set of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). SDG 3 seeks to promote Global Health and the quality of public health systems in developing countries. The achievement of these goals requires the commitment of all signing countries, but the COVID-19 crisis is changing the behavior of the main stakeholders in the international arena. What do the experts think about these changes? Could these changes threaten the 2030 Agenda and Global Health? To answer these questions, we conduct a content analysis of 152 documents written by experts from the 15 main think tanks on international development policy. The results point out that the new scenario brought about by the pandemic is hindering the necessary cooperation between countries to achieve global health goals and to guarantee public health coverage in developing countries. To deal with these challenges, more delegation of powers to international organizations and a reform of the international cooperation system are needed. With this analysis, we launch a warning about potential weaknesses of the institutional design of the 2030 Agenda in order for it to survive in a post-COVID-19 world and remain a valid instrument to promote health worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   The rational design of international institutions [J].
Koremenos, B ;
Lipson, C ;
Snidal, D .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2001, 55 (04) :761-+
[22]  
Koremenos Barbara., 2016, CONTINENT INT LAW EX, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316415832
[23]   Brazilian think tanks and the rise of austerity discourse [J].
Ladi, Stella ;
Lazarou, Elena ;
Hauck, Juliana .
POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 37 (02) :222-242
[24]   Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance [J].
Lake, David A. .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2010, 54 (03) :587-613
[25]  
Li Cheng., 2017, POWER IDEAS RISING I
[26]  
Martin LL., 2013, Handbook of International Relations, V2, P326
[27]   Regional variation in primary care improvement strategies and policy: case studies that consider qualitative contextual data for performance measurement in three Canadian provinces [J].
Martin-Misener, Ruth ;
Wong, Sabrina T. ;
Johnston, Sharon ;
Blackman, Stephanie ;
Scott, Catherine ;
Hogg, William ;
Burge, Fred ;
Grool, Anne M. ;
Campbell, John L. ;
Wuite, Sara .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (10)
[28]  
McGann James G., 2019 GLOBAL GO THINK
[29]   Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals [J].
Nilsson, Mans ;
Griggs, Dave ;
Visbeck, Martin .
NATURE, 2016, 534 (7607) :320-322
[30]   The importance of an integrating framework for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: the example of health and well-being [J].
Nunes, Ana Raquel ;
Lee, Kelley ;
O'Riordan, Tim .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2016, 1 (03)