Testing Moderation in Business and Psychological Studies with Latent Moderated Structural Equations

被引:78
作者
Cheung, Gordon W. [1 ]
Cooper-Thomas, Helena D. [2 ]
Lau, Rebecca S.
Wang, Linda C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Management & Int Business, Room 469,Owen G Glenn Bldg,4-F,12 Grafton Rd, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Auckland Univ Technol, Fac Business Econ & Law, Dept Management, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Hang Seng Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management, Sch Business, Shatin, Lee Quo Wei Acad Bldg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Interaction effects; Moderating effects; Latent moderated structural equations; Moderated multiple regression; Reliability-corrected single-indicator LMS; BEST-PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; VARIABLE INTERACTIONS; MODELS; STRATEGIES; PERFORMANCE; LISREL; LMS; SEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Most organizational researchers understand the detrimental effects of measurement errors in testing relationships among latent variables and hence adopt structural equation modeling (SEM) to control for measurement errors. Nonetheless, many of them revert to regression-based approaches, such as moderated multiple regression (MMR), when testing for moderating and other nonlinear effects. The predominance of MMR is likely due to the limited evidence showing the superiority of latent interaction approaches over regression-based approaches combined with the previous complicated procedures for testing latent interactions. In this teaching note, we first briefly explain the latent moderated structural equations (LMS) approach, which estimates latent interaction effects while controlling for measurement errors. Then we explain the reliability-corrected single-indicator LMS (RCSLMS) approach to testing latent interactions with summated scales and correcting for measurement errors, yielding results which approximate those from LMS. Next, we report simulation results illustrating that LMS and RCSLMS outperform MMR in terms of accuracy of point estimates and confidence intervals for interaction effects under various conditions. Then, we show how LMS and RCSLMS can be implemented with Mplus, providing an example-based tutorial to demonstrate a 4-step procedure for testing a range of latent interactions, as well as the decisions at each step. Finally, we conclude with answers to some frequently asked questions when testing latent interactions. As supplementary files to support researchers, we provide a narrated PowerPoint presentation, all Mplus syntax and output files, data sets for numerical examples, and Excel files for conducting the loglikelihood values difference test and plotting the latent interaction effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1033
页数:25
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [31] Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter
    Goodman, SA
    Svyantek, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1999, 55 (02) : 254 - 275
  • [32] Adding missing-data-relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models
    Graham, JW
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2003, 10 (01) : 80 - 100
  • [33] Hair J., 2010, Multivariate Data Analysis (7thed), V7th
  • [34] Item Parceling Strategies in SEM: Investigating the Subtle Effects of Unmodeled Secondary Constructs
    Hall, Rosalie J.
    Snell, Andrea F.
    Foust, Michelle Singer
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1999, 2 (03) : 233 - 256
  • [35] Assessing Spurious Interaction Effects in Structural Equation Modeling: A Cautionary Note
    Harring, Jeffrey R.
    Weiss, Brandi A.
    Li, Ming
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2015, 75 (05) : 721 - 738
  • [36] Hayduk L. A., 1987, STRUCTURAL EQUATION
  • [37] Johnson PO, 1936, Statistical Research Memoirs, V1, P57
  • [38] Hierarchical Representations of the Five-Factor Model of Personality in Predicting Job Performance: Integrating Three Organizing Frameworks With Two Theoretical Perspectives
    Judge, Timothy A.
    Rodell, Jessica B.
    Klinger, Ryan L.
    Simon, Lauren S.
    Crawford, Eean R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 98 (06) : 875 - 925
  • [39] Karasek R.A., 1985, Job Content Instrument: Questionnaire and User's Guide
  • [40] Advanced Nonlinear Latent Variable Modeling: Distribution Analytic LMS and QML Estimators of Interaction and Quadratic Effects
    Kelava, Augustin
    Werner, Christina S.
    Schermelleh-Engel, Karin
    Moosbrugger, Helfried
    Zapf, Dieter
    Ma, Yue
    Cham, Heining
    Aiken, Leona S.
    West, Stephen G.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2011, 18 (03) : 465 - 491