Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data

被引:30
作者
Lopes, Marcos S. [1 ,2 ]
Bastiaansen, John W. M. [2 ]
Janss, Luc [3 ]
Knol, Egbert F. [1 ]
Bovenhuis, Henk [2 ]
机构
[1] Topigs Norsvin Res Ctr, NL-6641 SZ Beuningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Quantitat Genet & Genom, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
关键词
SNP; variance component; phenotype prediction; pigs; GenPred; shared data resource; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; BODY-WEIGHT; MUSCLE MASS; IGF2; LOCUS; PIGS; HERITABILITY; SELECTION; REVEALS; QTL; EPISTASIS;
D O I
10.1534/g3.115.019513
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Traditionally, exploration of genetic variance in humans, plants, and livestock species has been limited mostly to the use of additive effects estimated using pedigree data. However, with the development of dense panels of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the exploration of genetic variation of complex traits is moving from quantifying the resemblance between family members to the dissection of genetic variation at individual loci. With SNPs, we were able to quantify the contribution of additive, dominance, and imprinting variance to the total genetic variance by using a SNP regression method. The method was validated in simulated data and applied to three traits (number of teats, backfat, and lifetime daily gain) in three purebred pig populations. In simulated data, the estimates of additive, dominance, and imprinting variance were very close to the simulated values. In real data, dominance effects account for a substantial proportion of the total genetic variance (up to 44%) for these traits in these populations. The contribution of imprinting to the total phenotypic variance of the evaluated traits was relatively small (1-3%). Our results indicate a strong relationship between additive variance explained per chromosome and chromosome length, which has been described previously for other traits in other species. We also show that a similar linear relationship exists for dominance and imprinting variance. These novel results improve our understanding of the genetic architecture of the evaluated traits and shows promise to apply the SNP regression method to other traits and species, including human diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:2629 / 2637
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Dissection of additive genetic variability for quantitative traits in chickens using SNP markers [J].
Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R. ;
Pakdel, A. ;
Nejati-Javaremi, A. ;
Shahrbabak, M. Moradi ;
Morota, G. ;
Valente, B. D. ;
Kranis, A. ;
Rosa, G. J. M. ;
Gianola, D. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2014, 131 (03) :183-193
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]  
Bruce A. B., 1910, Science New York N S, V32, DOI 10.1126/science.32.827.627-a
[4]   FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN GENETICS The genetics of inbreeding depression [J].
Charlesworth, Deborah ;
Willis, John H. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2009, 10 (11) :783-796
[5]   Body composition and gene expression QTL mapping in mice reveals imprinting and interaction effects [J].
Cheng, Ye ;
Rachagani, Satyanarayana ;
Canovas, Angela ;
Mayes, Mary Sue ;
Tait, Richard G., Jr. ;
Dekkers, Jack C. M. ;
Reecy, James M. .
BMC GENETICS, 2013, 14
[6]   Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers [J].
Da, Yang ;
Wang, Chunkao ;
Wang, Shengwen ;
Hu, Guo .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01)
[7]   Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding [J].
Davenport, CB .
SCIENCE, 1908, 28 :454-455
[8]  
de Koning DJ, 2002, GENETICS, V161, P931
[9]   Predicting genetic predisposition in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers [J].
de los Campos, Gustavo ;
Gianola, Daniel ;
Allison, David B. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2010, 11 (12) :880-886
[10]   GAMETIC IMPRINTING EFFECTS ON RATE AND COMPOSITION OF PIG GROWTH [J].
DEVRIES, AG ;
KERR, R ;
TIER, B ;
LONG, T ;
MEUWISSEN, THE .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1994, 88 (08) :1037-1042