Analysis of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment to Predict for Biochemical Failure After External Beam Radiotherapy or Prostate Seed Brachytherapy

被引:11
作者
Delouya, Guila
Krishnan, Vimal
Bahary, Jean-Paul
Larrivee, Sandra
Taussky, Daniel
机构
[1] Univ Montreal CHUM, Ctr Hosp, Hop Notre Dame, Dept Radiat Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal Hosp, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; RECURRENCE; CAPRA; METAANALYSIS; SYSTEM; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To analyze the value of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score to predict biochemical failure (bF) in patients with D'Amico low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with different radiation techniques. METHODS We analyzed 744 patients treated with either external beam radiotherapy (52.7%) or permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy (47.3%) without any androgen deprivation. External beam radiotherapy dose levels were extreme hypofractionation (45 Gy in 9 fractions) in 10%, 76-79.2 Gy (in 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction) in 32.7%, and 70.2-74 Gy in 10%. All patients had a minimum of 36-month follow-up. Cox regression analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to predict for bF, as per the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen-nadir + 2 ng/mL). RESULTS Median follow-up for patients without bF was 56 months (range, 36-114 months). In univariate analysis, CAPRA score as a continuous variable was predictive of bF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.79; P <.001), and in multivariate analysis adjusted for treatment type, the HR was 1.39 (95% CI, 1.14-1.71; P = .002). D'Amico intermediate-risk vs low- risk patients had an HR for bF of 1.93 (95% CI, 1.07-3.47; P = .029) in univariate analysis, but the difference was not statistically significant anymore after adjustment for treatment type, (P = .206). The area under the curve of the CAPRA score as a continuous variable at 3 and 5 years was 0.66 and 0.62, respectively (P = .005 for both years). CONCLUSION The CAPRA score is predictive of bF. Each 1-point rise increased the risk of bF by 39%, which is comparable to surgical series. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 633
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Multiinstitutional validation of the UCSF cancer of the prostate risk assessment for prediction of recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Pasta, David J. ;
Elkin, Eric P. ;
Presti, Joseph C., Jr. ;
Amling, Christopher L. ;
Terris, Martha K. ;
Aronson, William J. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
CANCER, 2006, 107 (10) :2384-2391
[2]   Risk Assessment for Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Mortality at the Time of Diagnosis [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Broering, Jeanette M. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (12) :878-887
[3]   The University of California, San Francisco cancer of the prostate risk assessment score: A straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Elkin, EP ;
Litwin, MS ;
Latini, DM ;
DuChane, J ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (06) :1938-1942
[4]   The Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) in patients treated with external beam radiation therapy: Evaluation and optimization in patients at higher risk of relapse [J].
Halverson, Schuyler ;
Schipper, Matthew ;
Blas, Kevin ;
Lee, Vivien ;
Sabolch, Aaron ;
Olson, Karin ;
Sandler, Howard M. ;
Feng, Felix Y. ;
Hamstra, Daniel A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 101 (03) :513-520
[5]   Does the Extent of Carcinoma in Prostatic Biopsies Predict Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence? A Systematic Review [J].
Harnden, Patricia ;
Shelley, Michael D. ;
Naylor, Brian ;
Coles, Bernadette ;
Mason, Malcolm D. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (04) :728-739
[6]   Should the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer be modified to account for high-grade tertiary components? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Harnden, Patricia ;
Shelley, Mike D. ;
Coles, Bernadette ;
Staffurth, John ;
Mason, Malcom D. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (05) :411-419
[7]   Risk Grouping Versus Risk Continuum in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Taxometric Test [J].
Ingram, David G. ;
Kattan, Michael W. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (05) :1937-1941
[8]  
Krishnan V, BJU INT, DOI [10.1111/bju.12587, DOI 10.1111/BJU.12587]
[9]   Head-to-Head Comparison of the Three Most Commonly Used Preoperative Models for Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Budaeus, Lars ;
Isbarn, Hendrik ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Chun, Felix K. ;
Schlomm, Thorsten ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Heinzer, Hans ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (04) :562-568
[10]   Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a European Multicenter survey of 1,296 patients [J].
May, Matthias ;
Knoll, Nina ;
Siegsmund, Michael ;
Fahlenkamp, Dirk ;
Vogler, Horst ;
Hoschke, Bernd ;
Gralla, Oliver .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (05) :1957-1962