Endoscopic suturing closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically feasible, fast, and eliminates the need for hospitalization (with videos)

被引:154
|
作者
Kantsevoy, Sergey V. [1 ]
Bitner, Marianne [1 ]
Mitrakov, Aleksandr A. [2 ]
Thuluvath, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mercy Med Ctr, Inst Digest Hlth & Liver Dis, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[2] FMBA Russian Federat, FBUZ Privolzhskij Area Med Ctr, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia
关键词
EMR; CLIP; RESECTION; FIXATION; FISTULA; DEVICE; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.051
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is less invasive than surgical resection, but the large mucosal defects after ESD may lead to adverse events necessitating hospitalizations. Objective: To evaluate the use of an endoscopic suturing device for closure of large mucosal defects after ESD. Design and Setting: Retrospective, single-center study. Patients: Twelve consecutive patients underwent ESD. Interventions: All lesions were removed by using a previously described ESD technique. The large mucosal defects post-ESD were completely closed with the endoscopic suturing device, and all patients were discharged home with subsequent clinical and endoscopic follow-up. Main Outcome Measurements: Bleeding and perforation rates after ESD with mucosal defect closure. Results: ESD followed by endoscopic suturing of the mucosal defects was performed in 12 patients ( mean age, 64.7 +/- 11.2 years, 4 lesions in the stomach, 8 lesions in the colon; mean lesion size, 42.5 +/- 14.8 mm) over a period of 8 months. All lesions (100%) were removed en bloc. Closure of post-ESD defects with an endoscopic suturing device was technically feasible and fast (mean closure time, 10.0 +/- 5.8 minutes per patient). Only 1 stitch (continuous suturing line) was required for complete closure in 8 patients. In the other 4 patients, the mucosal defect was closed with 2 to 4 separate stitches (mean number of sutures per patient, 1.6 +/- 1.0). There were no immediate or delayed adverse events in any of the study patients. Limitations: Retrospective study. Conclusions: Closure of large post-ESD defects with the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device is technically feasible and fast and can significantly decrease treatment cost by eliminating the need for hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 507
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Novel reopenable clip with anchor prongs facilitates mucosal defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Pilot feasibility study (with video)
    Tada, Naoya
    Tamai, Naoto
    Ito, Mamoru
    Fukuda, Mai
    Futakuchi, Toshiki
    Horiuchi, Hideka
    Kobayashi, Masakuni
    Sumiyama, Kazuki
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 36 (10) : 1164 - 1170
  • [42] Does Prophylactic Closure Improve Outcomes After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dong, Liang
    Zhu, Weihua
    Zhang, Xiaolei
    Xie, Xiao
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2024, 34 (01): : 94 - 100
  • [43] A novel clip closure method using precutting and a reopenable clip after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Ohmori, Masayasu
    Yamasaki, Yasushi
    Yamamoto, Shumpei
    Kinugasa, Hideaki
    Harada, Keita
    Hiraoka, Sakiko
    Okada, Hiroyuki
    ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (08) : E401 - E402
  • [44] Effect of prophylactic closure on adverse events after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A meta-analysis
    Liu, Mingqing
    Zhang, Yangyu
    Wang, Yueqi
    Zhu, He
    Xu, Hong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 (11) : 1869 - 1877
  • [45] Successful endoscopic closure using over-the-scope clip for delayed stomach perforation caused by nasogastric tube after endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Abe, Seiichiro
    Minagawa, Takeyoshi
    Tanaka, Hirohito
    Oda, Ichiro
    Saito, Yutaka
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 : E56 - E57
  • [46] Clinical course after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the rectum leaving a circumferential mucosal defect of 26 cm in length
    Ohara, Yoshiko
    Toyonaga, Takashi
    Tsubouchi, Eiji
    Takihara, Hiroshi
    Baba, Shinichi
    Tanaka, Shinwa
    Azuma, Takeshi
    ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 : E4 - E5
  • [47] Helix tack-and-suture device for mucosal defect closure following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: is it ready for global adoption?
    Ullah, Saif
    Ali, Faisal S.
    Ostovan, Maral
    Liu, Bing-Rong
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (08) : 780 - 780
  • [48] Comparisons of the Mucosal Healing Process between Flat and Protruded Type after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms
    Kim, In Sung
    Shin, Sung Jae
    Noh, Choong-Kyun
    Jung, Min Wuk
    Park, Hye Lin
    Kang, Je Wuk
    Lee, Jae Eun
    Lim, Sun Gyo
    Lee, Kee Myung
    Lee, Kwang Jae
    Cho, Hyo Jung
    Yang, Min Jae
    Kim, Soon Sun
    Hwang, Jae Chul
    Cheong, Jae Youn
    Yoo, Byung Moo
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Cho, Sung Won
    DIGESTION, 2019, 99 (03) : 219 - 226
  • [49] Prophylactic steroid administration against strictures is not enough for mucosal defects involving the entire circumference of the esophageal lumen after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)
    Kadota, Tomohiro
    Yoda, Yusuke
    Hori, Keisuke
    Shinmura, Kensuke
    Oono, Yasuhiro
    Ikematsu, Hiroaki
    Yano, Tomonori
    ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 17 (04) : 440 - 447
  • [50] A novel through-the-scope helix tack-and-suture device for mucosal defect closure following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study
    Farha, Jad
    Ramberan, Hemchand
    Aihara, Hiroyuki
    Zhang, Linda Y.
    Mehta, Amit S.
    Hage, Camille
    Schlachterman, Alexander
    Kumar, Anand
    Shinn, Brianna
    Canakis, Andrew
    Kim, Raymond E.
    D'Souza, Lionel S.
    Buscaglia, Jonathan M.
    Storm, Andrew C.
    Samarasena, Jason
    Chang, Kenneth
    Friedland, Shai
    Draganov, Peter, V
    Qumseya, Bashar J.
    Jawaid, Salmaan
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    Hasan, Muhammad K.
    Yang, Dennis
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (06) : 571 - 577