De-stabilizing and training effects of foot orthoses in multiple sclerosis

被引:29
作者
Ramdharry, GM
Marsden, JF
Day, BL
Thompson, AJ
机构
[1] Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, MRC, Human Movement Grp, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] UCL Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Neurorehabil & Therapy Serv Dept, London WC1N 3BG, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
balance; foot; multiple sclerosis; orthoses; rehabilitation; walking;
D O I
10.1191/135248506ms1266oa
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study evaluates the effects of dynamic foot orthoses (DFO) on walking and balance performance in people with multiple sclerosis ( MS). Sixteen ambulant subjects with MS and ten age-matched healthy control subjects were studied on initial receipt of foot orthoses and after four weeks of daily wear. Walking speed, MS Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) and standing balance were assessed with and without orthoses at both these times. During standing, stance width and vision were varied, and performance was quantified using the velocity of the centre of pressure ( COP), body sway velocity and the mean COP position relative to the shoe. People with MS walked slower ( P< 0.001) and showed increased sway when standing ( P< 0.001). At the first assessment, the foot orthoses caused an increase in sway and a medial and posterior shift of the COP position. At repeat measurement, the DFOs continued to increase sway compared to a shoe only condition. However, MS subjects reported an improvement in the MSWS-12 ( P< 0.05) and, compared to the initial session, showed decreased sway when eyes were closed both with and without DFOs. Dynamic foot orthoses may increase sway and change COP position by altering foot alignment and/ or plantar afferent stimulation. Improvement in body sway over time may be an overall training effect of the DFOs, as MS subjects adapt to the initial de-stabilization.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 226
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   USING ISOKINETIC DYNAMOMETRY TO TEST AMBULATORY PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
ARMSTRONG, LE ;
WINANT, DM ;
SWASEY, PR ;
SEIDLE, ME ;
CARTER, AL ;
GEHLSEN, G .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1983, 63 (08) :1274-1279
[2]   Assistive devices for balance and mobility: Benefits, demands, and adverse consequences [J].
Bateni, H ;
Maki, BE .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (01) :134-145
[3]   Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients [J].
Benedetti, MG ;
Piperno, R ;
Simoncini, L ;
Bonato, P ;
Tonini, A ;
Giannini, S .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 1999, 5 (05) :363-368
[4]  
Carr JH, 1998, NEUROLOGICAL REHABIL
[5]   Do static or dynamic AFOs improve balance? [J].
Cattaneo, D ;
Marazzini, F ;
Crippa, A ;
Cardini, R .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 16 (08) :894-899
[6]   FORCE-TIME MEASUREMENTS OF KNEE MUSCLE FUNCTIONS OF SUBJECTS WITH MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
CHEN, WY ;
PIERSON, FM ;
BURNETT, CN .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (06) :934-940
[7]   The influence of foam surfaces on biomechanical variables contributing to postural control [J].
Chiang, JH ;
Wu, G .
GAIT & POSTURE, 1997, 5 (03) :239-245
[8]   Comparison of Cawthorne-Cooksey exercises and sinusoidal support surface translations to improve balance in patients with unilateral vestibular deficit [J].
Corna, S ;
Nardone, A ;
Prestinari, A ;
Galante, M ;
Grasso, M ;
Schieppati, M .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (08) :1173-1184
[9]   EFFECT OF VISION AND STANCE WIDTH ON HUMAN-BODY MOTION WHEN STANDING - IMPLICATIONS FOR AFFERENT CONTROL OF LATERAL SWAY [J].
DAY, BL ;
STEIGER, MJ ;
THOMPSON, PD ;
MARSDEN, CD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1993, 469 :479-499
[10]   THE COORDINATION OF POSTURE AND VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBELLAR DYSFUNCTION [J].
DIENER, HC ;
DICHGANS, J ;
GUSCHLBAUER, B ;
BACHER, M ;
RAPP, H ;
KLOCKGETHER, T .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 1992, 7 (01) :14-22