Ultrasonic cleaning of 3D printed objects and Cleaning Challenge Devices

被引:36
|
作者
Verhaagen, Bram [1 ]
Zanderink, Thijs [2 ]
Rivas, David Fernandez [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] BuBclean, NL-7521 PH Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Appl Sci, Saxion, NL-7513 AB Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, Mesoscale Chem Syst, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D printing; Bubble; Cleaning; Ultrasonic cleaning; Sonication;
D O I
10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.06.010
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
We report our experiences in the evaluation of ultrasonic cleaning processes of objects made with additive manufacturing techniques, specifically three-dimensional (3D) printers. These objects need to be cleaned of support material added during the printing process. The support material can be removed by dissolution in liquids with or without ultrasonic cavitation. Distinctive stages in the cleaning processes were found for two different liquids (water and NaOH solutions). The combination of ultrasound and high concentration of NaOH has the best results for support material dissolution in the particular conditions studied. The sonication of cleaning processes in ultrasonic baths is typically a slow process. Here we show the advantages of using an ultrasonic horn to clean the surface of small parts and holes more effectively. We introduce a Cleaning Challenge Device design to be used for the universal evaluation of cleaning performance of different equipment or processes, and specifically for ultrasonic baths. The results and conclusions can be of use for different cleaning situations besides 3D printed parts, such as when deciding which protocol has a better performance or comparing different equipment. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 181
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3D printed tooling for thermoforming of medical devices
    Chimento, Jairo
    Highsmith, M. Jason
    Crane, Nathan
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (05) : 387 - 392
  • [32] Photogrammetric measurements of 3D printed microfluidic devices
    Guerra, M. G.
    Volpone, C.
    Galantucci, L. M.
    Percoco, G.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 21 : 53 - 62
  • [33] 3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated valves
    Rogers, Chad I.
    Qaderi, Kamran
    Woolley, Adam T.
    Nordin, Gregory P.
    BIOMICROFLUIDICS, 2015, 9 (01):
  • [34] 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers
    Waheed, Sidra
    Cabot, Joan M.
    Macdonald, Niall P.
    Lewis, Trevor
    Guijt, Rosanne M.
    Paull, Brett
    Breadmore, Michael C.
    LAB ON A CHIP, 2016, 16 (11) : 1993 - 2013
  • [35] 3D printed microstructures for flexible electronic devices
    Liu, Yiming
    Xu, Yeshou
    Avila, Raudel
    Liu, Chao
    Xie, Zhaoqian
    Wang, Lidai
    Yu, Xinge
    NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 30 (41)
  • [36] 3D printed electrochemical energy storage devices
    Chang, Peng
    Mei, Hui
    Zhou, Shixiang
    Dassios, Konstantinos G.
    Cheng, Laifei
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A, 2019, 7 (09) : 4230 - 4258
  • [37] 3D printed modules for integrated microfluidic devices
    Lee, Kyoung G.
    Park, Kyun Joo
    Seok, Seunghwan
    Shin, Sujeong
    Kim, Do Hyun
    Park, Jung Youn
    Heo, Yun Seok
    Lee, Seok Jae
    Lee, Tae Jae
    RSC ADVANCES, 2014, 4 (62): : 32876 - 32880
  • [38] Development of a laser cleaning robot system for the processing of 3D surfaces
    Rodriguez, Angel
    Lopez, Ana J.
    Lamas, Javier
    Moreno, Alicia
    Ramil, Alberto
    MULTIMODAL SENSING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS II, 2021, 11785
  • [39] Total Denoising: Unsupervised Learning of 3D Point Cloud Cleaning
    Hermosilla, Pedro
    Ritschel, Tobias
    Ropinski, Timo
    2019 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV 2019), 2019, : 52 - 60
  • [40] Antimicrobial 3D Printed Objects in the Fight Against Pandemics
    Mathew, Essyrose
    Gilmore, Brendan F.
    Larraneta, Eneko
    Lamprou, Dimitrios A.
    3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 8 (01) : 79 - 86