Altmetrics Research Progress: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization

被引:6
作者
Sinha, Prashant Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Sahoo, Subhranshu Bhushan [1 ,2 ]
Gajbe, Sagar Bhimrao [1 ,2 ]
Chakrabory, Kanu [3 ]
Mahato, Shiva Shankar [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Stat Inst, Documentat Res & Training Ctr, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[2] Calcutta Univ, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol BHU, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
[4] IISER, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Altmetrics; Bibliometric Analysis; Scopus; VOSviewer; Research Progress; RESEARCH IMPACT; SCIENTOMETRICS; COLLABORATION; PUBLICATIONS; ARTICLES;
D O I
10.5530/jscires.9.3.37
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The present study explores the altmetrics research area through bibliometric analysis and visualization. For the investigation of research material Scopus database was chosen, to obtain the bibliographic data. The search in database resulted in 973 documents. The data was obtained in CSV file format and for the basic data processing excel was used whereas for the visualization network VOSviewer software was employed. The investigation revealed that around 30.34% documents have open access. The major document type was articles (65.05%), with journals (81.39%) as major sources for document and English (92.70%) as the dominant language for documents. The research also revealed that there has been a constant rise in the number of publications in the field since its inception and documents belong to different subject areas with social science leading the way. The major sources were Scientometrics (12.33%) and Journal of Informetrics (3.18%). Most productive authors were Mike Thelwall (41 documents), Lutz Bornmann (32 documents): most producing countries were USA (264 documents) United Kingdom (141 documents); and most producing organizations were University of Wolverhampton with 43 documents, Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society with 32 documents. The visualization of author network revealed that collaborations between top authors are taking place but in a close knitted environment where one group of authors do not collaborate much with other group. The country collaboration network revealed that the top countries are extensively collaborating without any restrictions and developing countries like India, Pakistan are part of this collaboration network as well. The term map created out of the abstract and title information of research documents also revealed the trend of research in the altmetrics field.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 309
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Altmetric.com, 2020, IS ALTMETRIC ATTENTI
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, DOI [DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3, DOI 10.1007/S11192-009-0146-3VAN]
  • [3] Banshal SK, 2019, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P1870
  • [4] How much research output from India gets social media attention?
    Banshal, Sumit Kumar
    Singh, Vivek Kumar
    Muhuri, Pranab K.
    Mayr, Philipp
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2019, 117 (05): : 753 - 760
  • [5] An altmetric analysis of scholarly articles from India
    Banshal, Sumit Kumar
    Singh, Vivek Kumar
    Kaderye, Golam
    Muhuri, Pranab Kumar
    Priego Sanchez, Belem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 34 (05) : 3111 - 3118
  • [6] The Use of Altmetrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Impact
    Barnes, Cameron
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN ACADEMIC & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2015, 46 (02) : 121 - 134
  • [7] Baskaran C, 2020, MEASURING IMPLEMENTI, P19
  • [8] Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics
    Bornmann, Lutz
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 103 (03) : 1123 - 1144
  • [9] Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics
    Bornmann, Lutz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2014, 8 (04) : 895 - 903
  • [10] Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada
    Campbell, David
    Picard-Aitken, Michelle
    Cote, Gregoire
    Caruso, Julie
    Valentim, Rodolfo
    Edmonds, Stuart
    Williams, Gregory Thomas
    Macaluso, Benoit
    Robitaille, Jean-Pierre
    Bastien, Nicolas
    Laframboise, Marie-Claude
    Lebeau, Louis-Michel
    Mirabel, Philippe
    Lariviere, Vincent
    Archambault, Eric
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2010, 31 (01) : 66 - 83