Assessing the sustainability impacts of food sharing initiatives: User testing The Toolshed SIA

被引:4
作者
Mackenzie, Stephen George [1 ]
Davies, Anna R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin, Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nat Sci, Discipline Geog, Dublin, Ireland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
sustainability impact assessment; food sharing; online toolkit; user testing; food system; sustainability reporting; TRIPLE BOTTOM-LINE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2022.807690
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The food system is unsustainable and requires reconfiguration, however more data is required to assess the impacts of action which might contribute to a more sustainable food future. Responding to this, extensive research with food sharing initiatives-activities which have been flagged for their potential sustainability credentials-led to the co-design of an online sustainability impact assessment (SIA) tool to support food sharing initiatives to asses and evidence their sustainability impacts. This paper reports on the initial user testing of the resulting online tool: The Toolshed which forms the indicator based SIA element of the SHARE IT platform. Feedback gathered from the initiatives testing the tool are analyzed and summaries of their reported impacts detailed. This analysis confirms the need for the tool, the relevance of the indicators included and the value of SIA reports for internal reflection and external communication. Nonetheless, challenges remain in relation to resourcing the practice of SIA reporting. We conclude with a plan for expanding engagement with The Toolshed and the wider SHARE IT platform.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process [J].
Assarroudi, Abdolghader ;
Nabavi, Fatemeh Heshmati ;
Armat, Mohammad Reza ;
Ebadi, Abbas ;
Vaismoradi, Mojtaba .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2018, 23 (01) :42-55
[2]   What are the barriers and facilitators for third sector organisations (non-profits) to evaluate their services? A systematic review [J].
Bach-Mortensen, Anders Malthe ;
Montgomery, Paul .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
[3]   Participatory scenario development for integrated sustainability assessment [J].
Bohunovsky, Lisa ;
Jaeger, Jill ;
Omann, Ines .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2011, 11 (02) :271-284
[4]   Sustainability assessment: the state of the art [J].
Bond, Alan ;
Morrison-Saunders, Angus ;
Pope, Jenny .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2012, 30 (01) :53-62
[5]   Re-evaluating Sustainability Assessment: Aligning the vision and the practice [J].
Bond, Alan J. ;
Morrison-Saunders, Angus .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2011, 31 (01) :1-7
[6]   Transitioning the food system: A strategic practice management approach for cities [J].
Cohen, Nevin ;
Ilieva, Rositsa T. .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2015, 17 :199-217
[7]   Innovation in impact assessment theory and practice: How is it captured in the literature? [J].
Costanzo, Bruno Pontes ;
Sanchez, Luis Enrique .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2019, 79
[8]  
Curran MA, 2012, Life Cycle Assess Handb, DOI [10.1002/9781118528372, DOI 10.1002/9781118528372]
[9]  
Davies A., 2018, Urban Agriculture Magazine, P38
[10]  
Davies A.R., 2012, ADV ECOPOLITICS, V9, DOI [10.1108/S2041-806X(2012)9, DOI 10.1108/S2041-806X(2012)9]