Marketing opportunities for certified pork chops

被引:63
作者
Nilsson, Tomas
Foster, Ken
Lusk, Jayson L.
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Rural Econ, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE | 2006年 / 54卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7976.2006.00067.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
U.S. consumers are increasingly concerned about food safety, environmental degradation, and animal welfare at the live animal production stage. In response, meat suppliers are developing food credence certification to secure market access, increase margins, and increase overall demand. The objective of this paper is to characterize the demand and the market potential of a credence certification program for pork in the United States. Information regarding consumer willingness to pay for the conventional and certified products is derived from a latent class random utility model. The willingness to pay estimates are subsequently compared to the costs of implementing the programs at the producer, packing, and retailing stages. One of the findings in this study is that a significant segment of consumers would purchase certified pork at the anticipated marginal cost of certification. Therefore, future studies should consequently focus on the welfare economic implications on consumers and meat suppliers from incomplete adoption of voluntary certification programs on the part of both producers and consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 583
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   What's it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation [J].
Adamowicz, WL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (03) :419-443
[2]  
Antle JM, 2001, HANDB ECON, V18, P1083
[3]   STATISTICAL BIAS FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATIVE HYPOTHETICAL SURVEYS [J].
BLACKBURN, M ;
HARRISON, GW ;
RUTSTROM, EE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (05) :1084-1088
[4]  
Boxall P. C., 2003, Journal of Forest Economics, V9, P75, DOI 10.1078/1104-6899-00027
[5]   Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Adamowicz, WL .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 23 (04) :421-446
[6]  
Brown RG, 2001, POPTRONICS, V2, P29
[7]   FREE COMPETITION AND OPTIMAL AMOUNT OF FRAUD [J].
DARBY, MR ;
KARNI, E .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1973, 16 (01) :67-88
[8]   DEMAND ELASTICITIES FROM A DISCRETE-CHOICE MODEL - THE NATURAL CHRISTMAS TREE MARKET [J].
DAVIS, GC ;
WOHLGENANT, MK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 75 (03) :730-738
[9]   Milk by any other name ... Consumer benefits from labeled milk [J].
Dhar, T ;
Foltz, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 87 (01) :214-228
[10]   CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS FOR ELASTICITIES AND FLEXIBILITIES - REEVALUATING THE RATIOS OF NORMALS CASE [J].
DORFMAN, JH ;
KLING, CL ;
SEXTON, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 72 (04) :1006-1017