Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits?

被引:224
作者
Redman, Charles L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
adaptation; adaptive capacity; resilience theory; sustainability science; transformation; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; SCIENCE; FRAMEWORK; TRANSFORMABILITY; ADAPTABILITY; PERSPECTIVES; TRANSITIONS; ARCHAEOLOGY; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.5751/ES-06390-190237
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches. Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably. Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future. Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination. Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   Sustainability science: The emerging research program [J].
Clark, WC ;
Dickson, NM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (14) :8059-8061
[12]  
Cooper J, 2012, SURVIVING SUDDEN ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE: UNDERSTANDING HAZARDS, MITIGATING IMPACTS, AVOIDING DISASTERS, P1
[13]  
Cumming GS, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
[14]  
Diamond J., 2005, Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed
[15]  
Fiksel J, 2006, SUSTAINABILITY-SCI P, V2, P14, DOI [10.1080/15487733.2006.11907980, DOI 10.1080/15487733.2006.11907980]
[16]  
Fisher ChristopherT., 2009, The Archaeology of Environmental Change: Socionatural Legacies of Degradation and Resilience
[17]   Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability [J].
Folke, Carl ;
Carpenter, Stephen R. ;
Walker, Brian ;
Scheffer, Marten ;
Chapin, Terry ;
Rockstrom, Johan .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2010, 15 (04)
[18]  
Gibson R., 2006, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V24, P170, DOI [10.3152/147154606781765147, DOI 10.3152/147154606781765147]
[19]  
Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
[20]  
Gunderson LH., 1995, Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions