A Bayesian hierarchical mixture approach to individual differences: Case studies in selective attention and representation in category learning

被引:61
作者
Bartlema, Annelies [1 ]
Lee, Michael [2 ]
Wetzels, Ruud [3 ,4 ]
Vanpaemel, Wolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Informat, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Spinoza Ctr Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Individual differences; Bayesian method; Hierarchical mixture model; Model selection; Parameter estimation; Category learning; GENERALIZED CONTEXT MODEL; CATEGORIZATION; EXEMPLAR; IDENTIFICATION; SIMILARITY; PROTOTYPE; ABSTRACTION; COMPLEXITY; INFERENCE; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmp.2013.12.002
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
We demonstrate the potential of using a Bayesian hierarchical mixture approach to model individual differences in cognition. Mixture components can be used to identify latent groups of subjects who use different cognitive processes, while hierarchical distributions can be used to capture more minor variation within each group. We apply Bayesian hierarchical mixture methods in two illustrative applications involving category learning. One focuses on a problem that is typically conceived of as a problem of parameter estimation, while the other focuses on a problem that is traditionally tackled from a model selection perspective. Using both previously published and newly collected data, we demonstrate the flexibility and wide applicability of the hierarchical mixture approach to modeling individual differences. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 150
页数:19
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1961, PSYCHOL MONOGRAPHS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, BAYESIAN DATA ANAL, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9780429258411, 10.1201/9780429258411]
[5]   RELATIONS BETWEEN PROTOTYPE, EXEMPLAR, AND DECISION BOUND MODELS OF CATEGORIZATION [J].
ASHBY, FG ;
MADDOX, WT .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 37 (03) :372-400
[6]   General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations [J].
Brooks, SP ;
Gelman, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (04) :434-455
[7]   Model evaluation using grouped or individual data [J].
Cohen, Andrew L. ;
Sanborn, Adam N. ;
Shiffrin, Richard M. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2008, 15 (04) :692-712
[8]   THE PROBLEM OF INFERENCE FROM CURVES BASED ON GROUP DATA [J].
ESTES, WK .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1956, 53 (02) :134-140
[9]   ARRAY MODELS FOR CATEGORY LEARNING [J].
ESTES, WK .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 18 (04) :500-549
[10]   Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance [J].
Estes, WK ;
Maddox, WT .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2005, 12 (03) :403-408