DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: a case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants

被引:128
作者
Liu, Xiaohong [1 ]
Chu, Junfei [2 ]
Yin, Pengzhen [2 ]
Sun, Jiasen [3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Business Vocat Coll, Dept Publ Serv & Management, Hefei 231131, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, 96 Jinzhai Rd, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Soochow Univ, Dongwu Business Sch, 50 Dongwu Rd, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Cross-efficiency evaluation; Undesirable output; Ranking priority; Eco-efficiency analysis; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; COMMON-WEIGHTS; DATA-SCIENCE; BIG-DATA; MODEL; UNITS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.069
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation has been widely accepted as a useful tool for performance evaluation and ranking of decision making units. However, the non-uniqueness of optimal weights is a problem that has reduced the usefulness of this powerful method. In addition, current studies generally have not considered the situation in which undesirable outputs appear in the data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation. To solve these problems, firstly, we present an equitable model for efficiency evaluation of decision-making units with undesirable outputs and introduce a technique for cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable outputs. Then, a ranking priority model is proposed considering the decision making units' intentions of pursuing the best ranking positions. In addition, an aggressive model is given to guarantee the uniqueness of the optimal solution. The proposed approach can not only solve the problem of non-uniqueness of optimal weights in data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation but also considers undesirable outputs and ranking preferences of the decision-making units. Finally, the proposed approach is applied for eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants in a big data environment, and the results show that most coal-fired power plants in China have not performed well. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 885
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function [J].
Chen, Yao ;
Du, Juan ;
Huo, Jiazhen .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 41 (03) :621-625
[12]   DEA Cobb-Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency [J].
Cook, W. D. ;
Zhu, J. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (02) :265-268
[13]   A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility [J].
Cook, W. D. ;
Liang, L. ;
Zha, Y. ;
Zhu, J. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2009, 60 (02) :276-281
[14]  
COOK WD, 1990, INFOR, V28, P113
[15]  
Cooper W. W., 1994, Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications
[16]  
DOYLE J, 1994, J OPER RES SOC, V45, P567, DOI 10.2307/2584392
[17]  
DOYLE JR, 1995, INFOR, V33, P205
[18]   Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders [J].
Falagario, Marco ;
Sciancalepore, Fabio ;
Costantino, Nicola ;
Pietroforte, Roberto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 218 (02) :523-529
[19]   A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA [J].
Ghasemi, M. -R. ;
Ignatius, Joshua ;
Emrouznejad, Ali .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 233 (03) :640-650
[20]   Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation [J].
Green, RH ;
Doyle, JR ;
Cook, WD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 90 (03) :461-472