Agricultural Risk Management Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

被引:66
作者
Zandi, Peyman [1 ]
Rahmani, Mohammad [2 ]
Khanian, Mojtaba [3 ]
Mosavi, Amir [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Allameh Tabatabai Univ, Ind Management Dept, Tehran 1489684511, Iran
[2] Bu Ali Sina Univ, Ind Management, Hamadan 6517838695, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Hamedan Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Hamadan 6518764811, Hamadan, Iran
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Civil Engn, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
[5] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Sch Econ & Business, N-1430 As, Norway
[6] Thuringian Inst Sustainabil & Climate Protect, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[7] Obuda Univ, Kando Kalman Fac Elect Engn, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
risk management; fuzzy; failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA); TOPSIS; VIKOR; analytical hierarchy process (AHP); multi-criteria decision making; big data; operations research; project management; sustainable development; uncertainty analysis; FOOD-SUPPLY CHAIN; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; SELECTION; INFORMATION; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture10110504
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a popular technique in reliability analyses. In a typical FMEA, there are three risk factors for each failure modes: Severity (S), occurrence (O), and detectability (D). These will be included in calculating a risk priority number (RPN) multiplying the three aforementioned factors. The literature review reveals some noticeable efforts to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional FMEA. The objective of this paper is to extend the application of FMEA to risk management for agricultural projects. For this aim, the factor of severity in traditional FMEA is broken down into three sub-factors that include severity on cost, the severity on time, and severity on the quality of the project. Moreover, in this study, a fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) integrated with a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used to address the limitations of the traditional FMEA. A sensitivity analysis was done by weighing the risk assessment factors. The results confirm the capability of this Hybrid-FMEA in addressing several drawbacks of the traditional FMEA application. The risk assessment factors changed the risk priority between the different projects by affecting the weights. The risk of water and energy supplies and climate fluctuations and pests were the most critical risk in agricultural projects. Risk control measures should be applied according to the severity of each risk. Some of this research's contributions can be abstracted as identifying and classifying the risks of investment in agricultural projects and implementing the extended FMEA and multicriteria decision-making methods for analyzing the risks in the agriculture domain for the first time. As a management tool, the proposed model can be used in similar fields for risk management of various investment projects.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 28
页数:27
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Risk Management in the Construction Industry Using Combined Fuzzy FMEA and Fuzzy AHP [J].
Abdelgawad, Mohamed ;
Fayek, Aminah Robinson .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (09) :1028-1036
[2]   Configuring Supply Chain Business Processes Using the SCOR Reference Model [J].
Ahoa, Emmanuel ;
Kassahun, Ayalew ;
Tekinerdogan, Bedir .
BUSINESS MODELING AND SOFTWARE DESIGN, BMSD 2018, 2018, 319 :338-351
[3]  
Ali Syed Mithun, 2017, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, V28, P180
[4]   Framework for evaluating risks in food supply chain: Implications in food wastage reduction [J].
Ali, Syed Mithun ;
Moktadir, Md. Abdul ;
Kabir, Golam ;
Chakma, Jewel ;
Rumi, Md. Jalal Uddin ;
Islam, Md. Tawhidul .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 228 :786-800
[5]   Sustainable agro-food supply chain design using two-stage hybrid multi-objective decision-making approach [J].
Allaoui, Hamid ;
Guo, Yuhan ;
Choudhary, Alok ;
Bloemhof, Jacqueline .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 89 :369-384
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LECT NOTES EC MATH S
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The basics of FMEA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, RISK MAN TOOLS EU AG
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J CIVIL ENG URBANISM
[10]  
Baccarini D., 2001, INT J PROJ MANAG, V19, P139, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00074-5