Staging of regional nodes in AJCC stage I and II melanoma:: 18FDG PET imaging versus sentinel node detection

被引:68
作者
Belhocine, T
Pierard, G
de Labrassinne, M
Lahaye, T
Rigo, P
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Liege, Div Nucl Med, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Liege, Dept Pathol, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Liege, Dept Dermatol, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp Liege, Dept Surg, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
cutaneous melanoma; sentinel node; lymphatic mapping; (18)FDG PET;
D O I
10.1634/theoncologist.7-4-271
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Primary Purpose. The staging of regional nodes by means of sentinel node detection has been shown to accurately detect subclinical nodal metastases from cutaneous melanoma. On the other hand, the oncological applications of F-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG PET) are, nowadays, firmly established. However, the sensitivity of such metabolic imaging for staging the regional nodes in primary melanoma remains debatable. We prospectively assessed the actual value of PET for detecting sentinel node metastases in 21 consecutive patients presenting with early-stage melanoma. Materials and Methods. Twenty-one melanoma patients scheduled for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy underwent fully corrected whole-body PET using (18)FDG. In all cases, the disease was initially classified as either stage I or II, from the latest version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. The sentinel node detection was systematically performed within the week following the PET scan. Serial sections of the sentinel nodes were analyzed by both conventional pathology and immunohistochemical staining. Metastatic sentinel nodes were also assessed for the size of tumor deposits and the degree of nodal involvement (focal, partial, or massive). The median follow-up time was 12 months. Results. Six of the 21 patients (28.5%) had an involved sentinel node. PET was positive in only one case with a sentinel node >1 cm. In the five other cases, the sentinel nodes missed by PET were <1 cm with focal and/or partial involvements. One patient, free of regional nodal metastases in both sentinel node detection and PET imaging, had, however, a same-basin recurrence 3 months later. In another case, PET had one false positive result. Overall, the sentinel detection of subclinical nodal metastases had a sensitivity of 86%. PET detected only 14% of sentinel node metastases. Conclusions. Sentinel node detection remains the procedure of choice for detecting subclinical lymph node involvement from primary cutaneous melanoma. Owing to its limited spatial resolution, PET appears insufficiently sensitive to identify microscopic nodal metastases. As a practical consequence, metabolic imaging is not recommended as a first-line imaging strategy for staging regional lymph nodes in patients with stage I or II melanoma.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of micrometastases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma
    Acland, KM
    Healy, C
    Calonje, E
    O'Doherty, M
    Nunan, T
    Page, C
    Higgins, E
    Russell-Jones, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (10) : 2674 - 2678
  • [2] The value of positron emission tomography scanning in the detection of subclinical metastatic melanoma
    Acland, KM
    O'Doherty, MJ
    Russell-Jones, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 42 (04) : 606 - 611
  • [3] Energy-based scatter correction for 3-D PET scanners using NaI(Tl) detectors
    Adam, LE
    Karp, JS
    Freifelder, R
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (05) : 513 - 521
  • [4] Adam LE, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, P1821
  • [6] Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma
    Balch, CM
    Buzaid, AC
    Soong, SJ
    Atkins, MB
    Cascinelli, N
    Coit, DG
    Fleming, ID
    Gershenwald, JE
    Houghton, A
    Kirkwood, JM
    McMasters, KM
    Mihm, MF
    Morton, DL
    Reintgen, DS
    Ross, MI
    Sober, A
    Thompson, JA
    Thompson, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (16) : 3635 - 3648
  • [7] BONI R, 1995, BRIT J DERMATOL, V132, P556
  • [8] Cochran AJ, 2000, CANCER, V89, P236, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<236::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-0
  • [10] Crippa F, 2000, J NUCL MED, V41, P1491