The minimally important difference of the Asthma Control Test

被引:402
作者
Schatz, Michael [1 ]
Kosinski, Mark [2 ]
Yarlas, Aaron S. [2 ]
Hanlon, Jennifer [2 ]
Watson, Maria E. [3 ]
Jhingran, Priti [3 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Med Ctr, Dept Allergy, San Diego, CA 92111 USA
[2] QualityMetric, Lincoln, NE USA
[3] GlaxoSmithKline, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
关键词
Asthma; asthma control; Asthma Control Test; minimally important difference; distribution-based method; anchor-based method; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; HEALTH-STATUS; VALIDITY; RESPONSIVENESS; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.053
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The Asthma Control Test (ACT) has been well validated, but a minimally important difference (MID) has not been established. Objective: We sought to identify an MID for the ACT. Methods: Data come from 4 independent samples of adult asthmatic patients. Distributional methods for determining the MID included 0.5 SD, 1 SEM, and 2 SEM. Anchor-based methods assessed the relationship of differences in ACT scores to (1) self-reported asthma severity, (2) asthma episode frequency in the past 4 weeks, (3) physician ratings of asthma control, (4) physician recommendation of a change in therapy, (5) FEV1, (6) the risk over the next 12 months of excess short-acting beta-agonist use and exacerbations, and (7) patient-defined changes in asthma course over 3 months. Results: Four thousand one hundred eighteen patients completed the ACT. The 0.5 SD criterion for MID ranged from 2.03 to 2.45 points (mean, 2.2 points). The 1 SEM criterion ranged from 1.77 to 2.05 points (mean, 1.88 points), and the 2 SEM criterion ranged from 3.55 to 4.10 points (mean, 3.75 points). Differences in mean ACT scores across patient groups differing on criterion measures ranged from 1.06 to 5.28 points (mean, 3.1 points). Predictive analyses showed that a difference of 3 points on the ACT was associated with a subsequent 76 % increased risk (95 % CI, 73 % to 79%) of excess short-acting beta-agonist use and a 33% increased risk (95 % Cl, 31 % to 35 %) of exacerbations. Conclusion: The data support an MID for the ACT of 3 points. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;124:719-23)
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 723
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, GLOB STRAT ASTHM MAN
  • [2] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, V2nd
  • [3] Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures
    Guyatt, GH
    Osoba, D
    Wu, AW
    Wyrwich, KW
    Norman, GR
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 77 (04) : 371 - 383
  • [4] Hays Ron D, 2005, COPD, V2, P63
  • [5] Hedges L.V., 1981, J. Educ. Stat., V6, P107, DOI DOI 10.3102/10769986006002107
  • [6] CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE - A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO DEFINING MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN PSYCHOTHERAPY-RESEARCH
    JACOBSON, NS
    TRUAX, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (01) : 12 - 19
  • [7] MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE
    JAESCHKE, R
    SINGER, J
    GUYATT, GH
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04): : 407 - 415
  • [8] Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire
    Juniper, EF
    Svensson, K
    Mörk, AC
    Ståhl, E
    [J]. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2005, 99 (05) : 553 - 558
  • [9] Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control
    Juniper, EF
    O'Byrne, PM
    Guyatt, GH
    Ferrie, PJ
    King, DR
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1999, 14 (04) : 902 - 907
  • [10] Kosinski M, 2009, CURR MED RES OPIN, V25, P717, DOI [10.1185/03007990802711602, 10.1185/03007990802711602 ]