A Manifesto for the Age-Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda

被引：110

作者：

Buffel, Tine ^{[1
]}

Phillipson, Chris ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Inst Collaborat Res Ageing, Sch Social Sci Sociol, Bridgeford St Bldg Room 2-13v, Manchester, Lancs, England

[2] Manchester Inst Collaborat Res Ageing, Sch Social Sci Sociol, Manchester, Lancs, England

来源：

JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY | 2018年 / 30卷 / 02期

基金：

英国经济与社会研究理事会;

关键词：

Age-friendly communities; social exclusion; urban development; urban aging; coproduction; OLDER-PEOPLE; LIFE-COURSE; COMMUNITIES; CITIES; POPULATIONS; INITIATIVES; PARTNERSHIP; CONTEXT; CANADA; HEALTH;

D O I：

10.1080/08959420.2018.1430414

中图分类号：

R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;

摘要：

Developing age-friendly cities and communities has become a key part of policies aimed at improving the quality of life of older people in urban areas. The World Health Organization has been especially important in driving the age-friendly agenda, notably through its global network of age-friendly cities and communities. Despite the expansion and achievements of the network, challenges remain in responding to the growth of inequality and the impact of economic austerity on aging policies. Against the background of these limitations, this article sets out a manifesto for the age-friendly movement aimed at raising the aspirations of what is now a worldwide movement. The areas covered in the manifesto are challenging social inequality, widening participation, coproducing and codesigning age-friendly communities, encouraging multisectorial and multidisciplinary collaboration, and integrating research with policy. The article concludes with a discussion on developing age-friendly work as a contribution to a new agenda for urban aging.

引用

页码：173 / 192

页数：20

共 76 条

[21]

Gonyea J.G., 2015, Public Policy & Aging Report, V25, P9, DOI DOI 10.1093/PPAR/PRU056

[22] Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Conceptual Issues and Key Questions [J].

Greenfield, Emily A. ;

Oberlink, Mia ;

Scharlach, Andrew E. ;

Neal, Margaret B. ;

Stafford, Philip B. .

GERONTOLOGIST, 2015, 55 (02) :191-198

[23] Constructions of frailty in the English language, care practice and the lived experience [J].

Grenier, Amanda .

AGEING & SOCIETY, 2007, 27 :425-445

[24]

Handler S., 2014, An alternative age-friendly handbook

[25]

Harvey D, 2008, NEW LEFT REV, P23

[26]

Ilinca S., 2016, GENDER SOCIAL CLASS

[27]

Kalache A, 2016, INT PERSPECT AGING, V14, P65, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_5

[28] Neighbourhoods and dementia in the health and social care context: a realist review of the literature and implications for UK policy development [J].

Keady, John ;

Campbell, Sarah ;

Barnes, Helen ;

Ward, Richard ;

Li, Xia ;

Swarbrick, Caroline ;

Burrow, Simon ;

Elvish, Ruth .

REVIEWS IN CLINICAL GERONTOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) :150-163

[29]

Kendig H., 2014, Building age-friendly communities: New approaches to challenging health and social inequalities, P102

[30]

Lawton M.P., 1982, AGING ENV, P33

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →