Everyone likes a winner: An empirical test of the effect of electoral closeness on turnout in a context of expressive voting

被引:34
作者
Ashworth, John
Geys, Benny
Heyndels, Bruno
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Econ, Durham DH1 1TA, England
[2] Vrije Univ Brussels, Dept Econ, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11127-005-9006-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Under instrumental voting closer elections are expected to have higher turnout. Under expressive voting, however, turnout may increase with decreasing closeness when voters have a preference for winners. An empirical test using data on Belgian municipal elections supports this. We find that turnout reaches a local maximum when the largest party in the election obtains just over 52% of the seats and then falls (supporting the "instrumental" closeness-argument). There is, however, another turning point: the presence of a highly dominating party (receiving at least two-thirds of the votes) stimulates turnout despite the fact
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 405
页数:23
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   RATIONAL CHOICE AND TURNOUT [J].
ALDRICH, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 37 (01) :246-278
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, LOCAL ELECTIONS EURO
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN M AM POL SCI ASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], CESIFO WORKING PAPER
[5]  
Anthony Downs., 1957, An economic theory of democracy
[6]   Redistribution as a local public good: An empirical test for Flemish municipalities [J].
Ashworth, J ;
Heyndels, B ;
Smolders, C .
KYKLOS, 2002, 55 (01) :27-56
[7]  
Bartels Larry M., 1988, Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice
[8]   Turnout in electoral democracies [J].
Blais, A ;
Dobrzynska, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 1998, 33 (02) :239-261
[9]   DOES PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION FOSTER VOTER TURNOUT [J].
BLAIS, A ;
CARTY, RK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 18 (02) :167-181
[10]   Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium [J].
Brennan, G ;
Hamlin, A .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1998, 95 (1-2) :149-175