Photoelastic Analysis of Stress Distribution in Different Retention Systems for Facial Prosthesis

被引:20
作者
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [1 ]
Ribeiro, Paula do Prado [1 ]
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [1 ]
Garcia Junior, Idelmo Rangel [2 ]
Pesqueira, Aldieris Alves [1 ]
Haddad, Marcela Filie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Integrated Clin & Oral Surg, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Dental implants; maxillofacial prosthesis; photoelasticity; RETAINED AURICULAR PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL REPORT; IMPLANT; MAGNET; BAR;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181a28a96
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the behavior and stress distribution of 3 retention systems associated with implant for facial prosthesis by using the photoelasticity method. A photoelastic model was made from the replica of the orbital region on the left side of a dry skull with two 4-mm implants fixed in the superior orbital region. Three facial prosthetic retention systems were made for this study: O'ring, bar-clip, and magnets. The set (model/retention systems/prosthesis) was placed in a polariscope, and then traction began to be applied to the retention systems. The limit values for removal of the retention system were obtained by tests performed in an EMIC Universal test machine. The results were obtained by observation during the experiments and by photographic record of the stress behavior in the photoelastic model, resulting from the traction of the retention systems. In the magnet system, a lowest formation of fringes was verified both around and between the implants; in the O'ring system, the formation of photoelastic fringes was noted between the implants in the apical region; and in the bar-clip system, there was a greater concentration of colored fringes in the regions between the implants and cervical area. Based on the results obtained, it was concluded that the retention systems produced different stress distribution characteristics that, in general, were concentrated in the area around the implants, and the highest concentration of fringes, in increasing order, occurred ill the retention systems of the magnets, O'ring, and bar-clip.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 761
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ALGHANNAM NA, 2005, J CONT DENT PRACT, V6, P1
[2]  
Allen PF, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V29, P99
[3]  
ARCURI MR, 1997, J PROSTHET DENT, V89, P446
[4]  
Baima R F, 1996, J Mich Dent Assoc, V78, P50
[5]   Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures [J].
Celik, Gozde ;
Uludag, Bulent .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 97 (04) :229-235
[6]  
Chandra T. S., 2008, J CONT DENT PRACT, V9, P1
[7]   Magnet-retained auricular prosthesis with an implant-supported composite bar: A clinical report [J].
Chung, RWC ;
Siu, ASC ;
Chu, FCS ;
Chow, TW .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (05) :446-449
[8]  
Davis D M, 2000, Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, V8, P131
[9]   Craniofacial osseointegration of a large midfacial bone-anchored combination maxillofacial prosthesis: A clinical report [J].
Evans, JH ;
Schweiger, JW ;
Wright, RF .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1996, 75 (05) :483-486
[10]   Use of Osseointegrated Implants Associated to Retention Systems in Rehabilitations with Oral and Maxillofacial Prostheses: A Review of Literature [J].
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho ;
Tabata, Lucas Fernando ;
Archangelo, Carlos Marcelo ;
Martins Junior, Manoel .
PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2007, 7 (03) :331-336