Understanding the Precariat through Labour and Work

被引:106
作者
Standing, Guy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, SOAS, London WC1E 7HU, England
[2] Int Labor Org, Socioecon Secur Programme, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/dech.12120
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article sets out a framework for analysing the globalizing labour process, arguing that the old dualisms of capital' versus labour' and formal sector' versus informal sector' are inadequate and unhelpful. It begins by making conceptual distinctions between work and labour and between labour and labour power, and goes on to identify a globalizing class structure in which a precariat' is emerging as a potentially transformative new mass class. Denied so-called labour rights' and social entitlements that went with twentieth century industrial citizenship, the growing precariat needs new systems of regulation, social protection and redistribution. These should be based on work and occupation rather than subordinated labour, will require new forms of collective action and representation, and should seek to redistribute the key assets of twenty-first century tertiary societies, including income security, control of time, financial capital and the commons.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 980
页数:18
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PRECARIAT NEW DANGER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganised Sector
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1844, EC PHILOS MANUSCRIPT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EC SECURITY BETTER W
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SOCIAL INCOME INSECU
[6]  
Bhattacharya S., 2011, INFORM ACCUMUL UNPUB
[7]  
Chayanov AleksandrV., 1925, THEORY PEASANT EC
[8]  
Chhachhi A., 1996, CONFRONTING STATE CA
[9]   Untitled [J].
Chhachhi, Amrita ;
Fraser, Nancy .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2011, 42 (01) :297-314
[10]  
Durkheim Emile., 1964, DIVISION LABOUR SOC