Outcomes in open structure septorhinoplasty

被引:0
作者
Sharma, S. D. [1 ]
Jacques, T. [1 ]
Abed, T. [1 ]
Gatland, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southend Hosp, ENT Dept, Southend On Sea SS0 0RY, Essex, England
来源
B-ENT | 2015年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
Rhinoplasty; acquired nasal deformities; patient outcome assessment; REVISION RHINOPLASTY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study assessed the patient-related outcome measures and complications of post-open structure septorhinoplasty. It also investigated the factors associated with the need for revision surgery. Methods: We prospectively reviewed the case notes of patients who underwent septorhinoplasty performed by a single rhinologist at our institute between August 2011 and August 2013. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) tool. Results: A total of 120 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 28.2 months. Eight patients (6.7%) required revision nasal surgery. There was a significant increase in the mean post-operative ROE score of all patients who underwent surgery (19.5 +/- 9.41 vs. 68.4 +/- 23.7,p<0.001). The rate of revision surgery was significantly higher in patients with complex surgeries (3/12 vs. 5/108,p=0.03). There were higher rates of nasal tip deformity surgery and augmentation surgery in the revision surgery group compared to the primary surgery group: 8/17 vs. 20/103, p=0.03 for nasal tip and 10/17 vs. 27/103,p=0.01 for augmentation. Conclusions: Open structure septorhinoplasty significantly increased the ROE score. Our rate of revision surgery, 6.7%, was lower than the average rate of 10%-18% reported in the literature. The rate of revision surgery was higher in cases judged pre-operatively to be more complex.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 266
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: A review and new directions
    Alsarraf, R
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2000, 24 (03) : 192 - 197
  • [2] Alsarraf R, 2001, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V3, P198, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.3.3.198
  • [3] RHINOPLASTY AND FACE
    AUFRICHT, G
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1969, 43 (03) : 219 - &
  • [4] Secondary rhinoplasty
    Bracaglia, R
    Fortunato, R
    Gentileschi, S
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 29 (04) : 230 - 239
  • [5] Comparative Analysis of Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasties According to Surgeon's Perspective, Patient Satisfaction, and Quality of Life
    Cingi, Cemal
    Eskiizmir, Gorkem
    Cakli, Hamdi
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 121 (05) : 322 - 327
  • [6] COPAS JB, 1989, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V42, P65, DOI 10.1016/0007-1226(89)90115-X
  • [7] Farrior E H, 1997, Facial Plast Surg, V13, P299
  • [8] KAMER FM, 1988, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V114, P257
  • [9] Rhinoplasty: An outcome research
    Meningaud, Jean-Paul
    Lantieri, Laurent
    Bertrand, Jacques-Charles
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (01) : 251 - 257
  • [10] Revision Rhinoplasty of Asian Noses Analysis and Treatment
    Park, Chan Hum
    Kim, Il Woo
    Hong, Seok Min
    Lee, Jun Ho
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2009, 135 (02) : 146 - 155