Toward a theory of agent-based systemic situational awareness

被引:0
作者
Walker, G [1 ]
Salmon, P [1 ]
Green, D [1 ]
Stanton, N [1 ]
Baber, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
来源
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, SITUATION AWARENESS AND AUTOMATION: CURRENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS, VOL 1 | 2004年
关键词
agents; systems; theory; dynamic; driving; shared SA; teams;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to propose foundations for a systemic theory of situation awareness based on the analysis of interactions between agents (i.e., both human and artefact) in subsystems. This approach may help promote a better understanding of technology-mediated interaction in systems, as well as helping in the formulation of hypotheses and predictions concerning shared situation awareness. It is proposed that agents within a system each hold their own situational awareness which may be very different from (although compatible with) other agents. It is argued that we should not hope for, or indeed want, sharing of this awareness, as different system agents have different purposes. This view marks situational awareness as a dynamic and collaborative process that binds agents together on tasks on a moment-by-moment basis. Implications of this viewpoint for development of a new theory of situational awareness are offered.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 87
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   SITUATION AWARENESS AND THE COGNITIVE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX-SYSTEMS [J].
ADAMS, MJ ;
TENNEY, YJ ;
PEW, RW .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1995, 37 (01) :85-104
[2]   Trust: Key Elements in Human Supervisory Control Domains [J].
M. J. Ashleigh ;
N. A. Stanton .
Cognition, Technology & Work, 2001, 3 (2) :92-100
[3]  
BABER C, 2004, OBSERVATION STUDY CO
[4]  
Bedny G., 1999, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, V3, P63, DOI [10.1207/s15327566ijce0301_5, DOI 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0301_5]
[5]   TOWARD A THEORY OF SITUATION AWARENESS IN DYNAMIC-SYSTEMS [J].
ENDSLEY, MR .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1995, 37 (01) :32-64
[6]  
Hollnagel E., 1993, Human reliability analysis: Context and control
[7]   Who is flying this plane anyway? What mishaps tell us about crew member role assignment and air crew situation awareness [J].
Jentsch, F ;
Barnett, J ;
Bowers, CA ;
Sales, E .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1999, 41 (01) :1-14
[8]   Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety [J].
Kaber, DB ;
Endsley, MR .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 1997, 16 (03) :126-131
[9]   TRUST IN AUTOMATION .1. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN THE STUDY OF TRUST AND HUMAN INTERVENTION IN AUTOMATED SYSTEMS [J].
MUIR, BM .
ERGONOMICS, 1994, 37 (11) :1905-1922
[10]   Trust in automation .2. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation [J].
Muir, BM ;
Moray, N .
ERGONOMICS, 1996, 39 (03) :429-460