Should Combination Chemotherapy Serve as the Backbone in Clinical Trials of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer?

被引:8
|
作者
Van Loon, Katherine [1 ]
Espinoza, Anne M. [1 ]
Fogelman, David R. [2 ]
Wolff, Robert A. [2 ]
Javle, Milind M. [2 ]
Iyer, Renuka V. [3 ]
Picozzi, Vincent J. [4 ]
Martin, Ludmila Katherine [5 ]
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios [5 ]
Tempero, Margaret A. [1 ]
Foster, Nathan R. [6 ]
Kim, George P. [7 ]
Ko, Andrew H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Div Canc Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Med, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Inst Digest Dis, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Med Ctr, Coll Med, Div Med Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Div Hematol & Oncol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
pancreatic cancer; gemcitabine; clinical trial design; pooled analysis; PHASE-III TRIAL; GEMCITABINE; BEVACIZUMAB; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1097/MPA.0000000000000095
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether building upon multidrug chemotherapy regimens represents a viable strategy in pancreatic cancer clinical trial design. Methods We performed a pooled analysis of all single-arm phase II studies in which a specific targeted agent (the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab) was added to gemcitabine-based cytotoxic doublets. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response rate, CA-19-9 biomarker response rate, and adverse event frequencies. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated time-to-event end points, whereas the Cox proportional hazard model estimated univariate hazard ratios of death. Results For the 300 patients included in the pooled analysis, median OS was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval, 8.3-10.2). Differences in OS were observed according to patients' baseline performance status (median OS, 10.4 vs 8.6 months for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 vs 1, respectively). Moreover, bevacizumab-related adverse events were not observed at increased frequency with gemcitabine-based doublets compared with historic data. Conclusions Recognizing the limitations of cross-study comparisons, these results compare favorably to those from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 80303, a phase III trial testing bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine alone. This is the largest data set available to demonstrate the feasibility of building upon more intensive chemotherapy backbones in clinical trials of novel targeted agents in pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 349
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Survival Benefits of Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in A Clinical Real-World Cohort
    Kordes, Maximilian
    Yu, Jingru
    Malgerud, Oscar
    Liljefors, Maria Gustafsson
    Lohr, J-Matthias
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [22] Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Secondary to Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated Successfully with Combination Chemotherapy
    Mast, Cathy
    Ramanathan, Ramesh K.
    Feinstein, Donald I.
    Rosen, Peter
    ONCOLOGY, 2014, 87 (05) : 266 - 269
  • [23] Gemcitabine-based combination therapy compared with gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials
    Jin, Shui-Fang
    Fan, Zhao-Kun
    Pan, Lei
    Jin, Li-Ming
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 16 (03) : 236 - 244
  • [24] Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Asia
    Li, Yanxun
    Sun, Jinjin
    Jiang, Zhijia
    Zhang, Linqiang
    Liu, Geng
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 27 (04) : 227 - 234
  • [25] Should gemcitabine be used as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer?
    O'Neil, Bert H.
    Goldberg, Richard M.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 4 (07): : 362 - 363
  • [26] Should gemcitabine be used as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer?
    Hammel, Pascal
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2007, 4 (08): : 460 - 461
  • [27] Outcome of upfront combination chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Reni, Michele
    Cereda, S.
    Balzano, G.
    Passoni, P.
    Rognone, A.
    Zerbi, A.
    Nicoletti, R.
    Mazza, E.
    Arcidiacono, P. G.
    Di Carlo, V.
    Villa, E.
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 64 (06) : 1253 - 1259
  • [28] Inferior Survival of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Who Received Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy but Did Not Participate in Clinical Trials
    Yang, Shih-Hung
    Kuo, Yu-Hsuan
    Tien, Yu-Wen
    Hsu, Chiun
    Hsu, Chih-Hung
    Kuo, Sung-Hsin
    Cheng, Ann-Lii
    ONCOLOGY, 2011, 81 (3-4) : 143 - 150
  • [29] Regional Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: RECLAP Trial
    Davis, Jeremy L.
    Pandalai, Prakash
    Ripley, R. Taylor
    Langan, Russell C.
    Steinberg, Seth M.
    Walker, Melissa
    Toomey, Mary Ann
    Levy, Elliot
    Avital, Itzhak
    TRIALS, 2011, 12
  • [30] Regional Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: RECLAP Trial
    Jeremy L Davis
    Prakash Pandalai
    R Taylor Ripley
    Russell C Langan
    Seth M Steinberg
    Melissa Walker
    Mary Ann Toomey
    Elliot Levy
    Itzhak Avital
    Trials, 12