Well-Being, Time, and Dementia

被引:19
作者
Hawkins, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Philosophy, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Trent Ctr Bioeth Humanities & Hist Med, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/675365
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Philosophers concerned with what would be good for a person sometimes consider a person''s past desires. Indeed, some theorists have argued by appeal to past desires that it is in the best interests of certain dementia patients to die. I reject this conclusion. I consider three different ways one might appeal to a person''s past desires in arguing for conclusions about the good of such patients, finding flaws with each. Of the views I reject, the most interesting one is the view that prudential value is, at least partly, concerned with the shape of a life as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 542
页数:36
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Adams Robert Merrihew, 1999, FINITE AND INFINITE, P83
[2]  
[Anonymous], THE HUMAN ANIMAL PER
[3]  
Brandt Richard., 1998, A Theory of the Good and the Right
[4]  
Buchanan Allen, 1990, DECIDING OTHERS ETHI, P152
[5]  
Darwall Stephen, 2002, WELFARE AND RATIONAL, p[73, 95]
[6]  
Darwall Stephen, 1983, IMPARTIAL REASON, P54
[7]  
DeGrazia David, 2005, HUMAN IDENTITY AND B
[8]  
Dresser Rebecca, 1986, ARIZ LAW REV, V28, P379
[9]  
Dworkin R, 1994, LIFES DOMINION, P218
[10]  
Epicurus, 1983, THE OXFORD BOOK OF D, P8