Similarity between referents constrains the processing of contrastive focus during reading

被引:2
作者
Chen, Shuang [1 ]
Tang, Yuqing [2 ]
Lv, Xiuna [1 ]
Paterson, Kevin B. [3 ]
Chen, Lijing [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, 1 Keji Rd, Fuzhou 350117, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Leicester, Dept Neurosci Psychol & Behav, Leicester, Leics, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Contrastive focus; eye movements during reading; Chinese; EYE-MOVEMENTS; CONTEXT; ATTENTION; EMPHASIS;
D O I
10.1177/1747021820945208
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Contrastive focus implies a contrast between two elements. However, it is unclear whether and how any interplay between such a contrast and similarity between potentially contrasting elements might affect focus processing. Accordingly, we report an eye movement experiment investigating this issue. The experiment used a background story to introduce eight characters whose social identities were manipulated to be similar or dissimilar. Participants first read this background story, then a series of two-sentence discourses while their eye movements were recorded. Each discourse referred to two characters from the passage who had either similar or dissimilar identities, with one (the target character) either focused using the Chinese particle zhiyou (meaning only) or unfocused. The results showed a typical focus facilitation effect, such that target character names were processed more quickly when focused than unfocused. We also observed a main effect of the similarity/dissimilarly of characters and, crucially, an interaction between this variable and focus. This interaction was due to slower processing of a post-target region when the target character was focused and the two characters had similar rather than dissimilar identities, but no such effect when the target character was unfocused. The findings suggest that establishing a contrast between referents is effortful during reading when these have similar rather than dissimilar social identities and so are more difficult to differentiate. The distinctiveness of referents in a discourse context may therefore constrain the establishment of contrastive focus during reading. We discuss these findings in relation to current theories of focus interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 53
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   INTERACTION WITH CONTEXT DURING HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
ALTMANN, G ;
STEEDMAN, M .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (03) :191-238
[2]  
Bever T., 1970, COGNITION DEV LANGUA, P279, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199677139.003.0001
[3]   Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading [J].
Birch, Stacy ;
Rayner, Keith .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (06) :740-752
[4]   Pragmatic influences on sentence integration: Evidence from eye movements [J].
Chen, Lijing ;
Paterson, Kevin B. ;
Li, Xingshan ;
Li, Lin ;
Yang, Yufang .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (12) :2742-2751
[5]   On the processing of pragmatic information: ERP effects of emphasis processing [J].
Chen, Lijing .
LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 33 (08) :1005-1016
[6]   Emphasizing the only character: Emphasis, attention and contrast [J].
Chen, Lijing ;
Yang, Yufang .
COGNITION, 2015, 136 :222-227
[7]   Focus, Newness and Their Combination: Processing of Information Structure in Discourse [J].
Chen, Lijing ;
Li, Xingshan ;
Yang, Yufang .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08)
[8]   Exhaustiveness effects in clefts are not truth-functional [J].
Drenhaus, Heiner ;
Zimmermann, Malte ;
Vasishth, Shravan .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2011, 24 (03) :320-337
[9]   Parsing with focus particles in context: Eye movements during the processing of relative clause ambiguities [J].
Filik, R ;
Paterson, KB ;
Liversedge, SP .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 53 (04) :473-495
[10]   What happened (and what did not): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives [J].
Fraundorf, Scott H. ;
Benjamin, Aaron S. ;
Watson, Duane G. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 69 (03) :196-227