共 54 条
Coextraction of acidic, basic and amphiprotic pollutants using multiwalled carbon nanotubes/magnetite nanoparticles@polypyrrole composite
被引:73
作者:
Asgharinezhad, Ali Akbar
[1
]
Ebrahimzadeh, Homeira
[1
]
机构:
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Chem, Tehran, Iran
关键词:
Dispersive micro-solid phase extraction;
Coextraction;
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes/Fe3O4@polypyrrole;
High performance liquid chromatography;
Pollutants;
SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION;
POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS;
LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTION;
COATED MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLES;
WATER SAMPLES;
AZO DYES;
SPECTROMETRIC DETERMINATION;
BIOLOGICAL-FLUIDS;
CHROMATOGRAPHY;
AMINES;
D O I:
10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.087
中图分类号:
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号:
071010 ;
081704 ;
摘要:
The simultaneous extraction of acidic, basic and amphiprotic pollutants from various samples is a considerable and disputable concept in sample preparation strategies. In this study, for the first time, coextraction of acidic, basic and amphiprotic pollutants (polar and apolar) with multiwalled carbon nanotubes/Fe3O4@polypyrrole (MWCNT5/Fe3O4@PPy) composite based dispersive micro-solid phase extraction followed by high performance liquid chromatography-photo diode array detection was introduced. Firstly, the extraction efficiency of various magnetic nanosorbents including Fe3O4, MWCNTs/Fe3O4, graphene oxide/Fe3O4 (GO/Fe3O4), Fe3O4@PPy, MWCNT5/Fe3O4@PPy and GO/Fe3O4@PPy were compared. The results revealed that MWCNT5/Fe3O4@PPy nanocomposite has higher extraction efficiency for five selected model analytes (4-nitrophenol, 3-nitroaniline, 2,4-dichloroaniline, 3,4-dichloroaniline and 1-amino-2-naphthol). Box-Behnken design methodology combined with desirability function approach was applied to find out the optimal experimental conditions. The opted conditions were: pH of the sample, 8.2; sorbent amount, 12 mg; sorption time, 5.5 min; salt concentration, 14% w/w; type and volume of the eluent, 120 mu L acetonitrile; elution time; 2 min. Under the optimum conditions detection limits and linear dynamic ranges were achieved in the range of 0.1-0.25 mu g L-1 and 0.5-600 mu g L-1, respectively. The percent of extraction recovery and relative standard deviations (n = 5) were in the range of 45.6-82.2 and 4.0-8.5, respectively. Ultimately, the applicability of this method was successfully confirmed by analyzing rain, snow and river water samples and satisfactory results were obtained. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文