Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Adolescents in English care: randomised trial and observational cohort evaluation

被引:35
作者
Green, J. M. [1 ]
Biehal, N. [2 ]
Roberts, C. [3 ]
Dixon, J. [4 ]
Kay, C. [1 ]
Parry, E. [5 ]
Rothwell, J. [1 ]
Roby, A. [1 ]
Kapadia, D. [1 ]
Scott, S. [6 ]
Sinclair, I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Inst Brain Behav & Mental Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Social Policy & Social Work, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Biostat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ York, SPRU, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Exeter, Mood Disorders Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England
[6] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
HEALTH GAIN; CHILD; INPATIENT; OUTCOMES; SCALES;
D O I
10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131466
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Children in care often have poor outcomes. There is a lack of evaluative research into intervention options. Aims To examine the efficacy of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Adolescents (MTFC-A) compared with usual care for young people at risk in foster care in England. Method A two-arm single (assessor) blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) embedded within an observational quasi-experimental case control study involving 219 young people aged 11-16 years (trial registration: ISRCTN 68038570). The primary outcome was the Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Secondary outcomes were ratings of educational attendance, achievement and rate of offending. Results The MTFC-A group showed a non-significant improvement in CGAS outcome in both the randomised cohort (n=34, adjusted mean difference 1.3, 95% CI -7.1 to 9.7, P=0.75) and in the trimmed observational cohort (n = 185, adjusted mean difference 0.95, 95% CI -2.38 to 4.29, P=0.57). No significant effects were seen in secondary outcomes. There was a possible differential effect of the intervention according to antisocial behaviour. Conclusions There was no evidence that the use of MTFC-A resulted in better outcomes than usual care. The intervention may be more beneficial for young people with antisocial behaviour but less beneficial than usual treatment for those without.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 223
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Achenbach T, 1983, MANUAL FOR THE CHILD
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]  
Berridge D, 2012, LIVING IN CHILDRENS
[4]   Routine outcome measurement in a child and adolescent mental health service: an evaluation of HoNOSCA [J].
Brann, P ;
Coleman, G ;
Luk, E .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 35 (03) :370-376
[5]   The Oregon multidimensional treatment foster care model: Features, outcomes, and progress in dissemination [J].
Chamberlain, P .
COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE, 2003, 10 (04) :303-312
[6]  
Department for Children Schools and Families, 2009, OUTCOME INDICATORS F
[7]  
Department for Education, 2010, IMPACT OF SURE START
[8]  
Department for Education, 2012, ME AND MY SCHOOL FIN
[9]  
Dixon J, 2013, BR J SOC WORK
[10]   Arrested development: The effects of incarceration on the development of psychosocial maturity [J].
Dmitrieva, Julia ;
Monahan, Kathryn C. ;
Cauffman, Elizabeth ;
Steinberg, Laurence .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 24 (03) :1073-1090