How to improve the performance of carbon tax in China?

被引:67
作者
Zhang, Zhe [1 ]
Zhang, Aizhen [2 ]
Wang, Daoping [1 ]
Li, Aijun [1 ]
Song, Huixuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Shandong Sch Dev, Ctr Econ Res, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Jinan, Sch Foreign Language, Jinan 250022, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
关键词
Renewable energy subsidy; CGE model; Rebound effect; Competitiveness issues; Carbon leakage; Carbon dioxide emission abatement costs; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CLIMATE POLICY; IMPACTS; COMPETITIVENESS; MODEL; RESPONSIBILITY; MITIGATION; INDUSTRY; WORLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Chinese government committed to controlling carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and promoting development of non-fossil fuels. Thus, it becomes a top priority for the government to develop effective climate policies. Against such background, this paper develops a new multi-country computable general equilibrium (CGE) model with detailed energy disaggregation. This study evaluates the impact of single policy instrument (carbon tax) and combined policy mixes, in order to investigate driving factors affecting the policy performance. The main findings are as follows. Firstly, the driving factors can be classified into two types. The first type of factors affects cost-effectiveness significantly, while the second type generates considerable effect on emission performance. Secondly, cross-border externalities function as important barriers to the CO2 emission reduction, since they imply extra competitiveness loss and result in considerable carbon leakage. Finally, this paper considers two integrated policy mixes, wherein carbon tax revenue is recycled to reduce capital tax or support clean energy subsidy. These policy mixes can improve both cost-effectiveness and emission performance, and thus perform better than carbon tax alone. In this way, carbon tax revenue can be used to improve the performance. Looking ahead, complicated policy mixes are preferred to improve the performance of China's carbon tax. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2060 / 2072
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STAT REV WORLD EN 20
[2]  
[Anonymous], CO2 EM FUEL COMB 201
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, UN COMMODITY TRADE S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ChinaDaily
[5]   Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies [J].
Branger, Frederic ;
Quirion, Philippe .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 99 :29-39
[6]  
Burniaux J. M., 2001, 4 ANN C GLOB EC AN
[7]   Carbon leakages: a general equilibrium view [J].
Burniaux, Jean-Marc ;
Martins, Joaquim Oliveira .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2012, 49 (02) :473-495
[8]   A Proximate Mirror: Greenhouse Gas Rules and Strategic Behavior Under the US Clean Air Act [J].
Burtraw, Dallas ;
Palmer, Karen ;
Paul, Anthony ;
Pan, Sophie .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 62 (02) :217-241
[9]   Sharing responsibility for carbon dioxide emissions: A perspective on border tax adjustments [J].
Chang, Ning .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 59 :850-856
[10]   Double dividend hypothesis, golden rule and welfare distribution [J].
Chiroleu-Assouline, Mireille ;
Fodha, Mouez .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 51 (03) :323-335