A new approach to determine maintenance periods of the most critical hydroelectric power plant equipment

被引:37
作者
Bulut, Merve [1 ]
Ozcan, Evrencan [1 ]
机构
[1] Kirikkale Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-71451 Kirikkale, Turkey
关键词
Maintenance periods; Weibull distribution; Hydroelectric power plant; AHP; TOPSIS; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; THE-ART SURVEY; DECISION-MAKING; MAINTAINABILITY ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; STRATEGY SELECTION; AHP APPROACH; TOPSIS; AVAILABILITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2020.107238
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Power plants are large-scale generation facilities with high investment costs established to ensure sustainable energy supply. Maintenance-Repair activities constitute the most critical process to be considered in these facilities. Because, these activities cause planned or unplanned generation interruptions. For this reason, it is of great importance to calculate the maintenance periods determined on the basis of equipment health in the power plants. From this point of view in this study, the problem of determining maintenance periods is handled in the big scale hydroelectric power plant in Turkey. Due to the complexity of problem environment particularly including 16 equipment groups with the highest level of criticality on the power plant, proposing combined multi criteria decision making model (MCDM) has become invaluable for the purpose of reaching convincing outcomes. In order to obtain maximum benefit, investigation for appropriate probability distributions of 11-year failure and repair data belonging to the equipment group and analyses for reliability, availability and maintainability analyses are performed for 16 critical equipment groups. Finally, maintenance periods for 16 equipment groups were calculated using the curve family formed by the cost coefficient of Weibull distribution parameters. On the specified maintenance days based on system reliability and maintenance costs, it was observed that 16 critical equipment had no failures during the 1-year monitoring process. This indicates a 100% improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
A ELSAYED E., 1996, Reliability Engineering
[2]   Multicriteria modelling of repair contract based on utility and ELECTRE I method with dependability and service quality criteria [J].
Almeida, AT .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 138 (01) :113-126
[3]  
Aly M.F, 2013, INT J ENG TRENDS TEC, V6, P247
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J KONBIN, DOI DOI 10.2478/JOK-2013-0051
[5]  
Atamer S, 2009, ULUDAG U J FAC ENG, V14
[6]  
Aydin MS, 2016, OPER MANAG, V946, P1020
[7]  
Balci NM, 2014, HYDROPOWER PLANT SPE
[8]   Reliability analysis of mining equipment: A case study of a crushing plant at Jajarm Bauxite Mine in Iran [J].
Barabady, Javad ;
Kumar, Uday .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (04) :647-653
[9]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[10]   PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Kazemadeh, R. B. ;
Albadvi, A. ;
Aghdasi, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) :198-215