Prognostic and predictive value of combined HE-4 and CA-125 biomarkers during chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

被引:13
作者
Potenza, Enrico [1 ]
Parpinel, Giulia [1 ]
Laudani, Maria E. [1 ]
Macchi, Chiara [1 ]
Fuso, Luca [2 ]
Zola, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, St Anna Hosp, Dept Surg Sci, Unity Gynecol & Obstet, Via Ventimiglia 3, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Surg Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Umberto I Hosp, Turin, Italy
关键词
Ovarian cancer; HE4; CA125; chemotherapy;
D O I
10.1177/1724600820955195
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction: At present there is no predictive value univocally associated with the success of chemotherapy. Biomarkers produced by ovarian cancer (HE4 and Ca125) could have a good prognostic significance. The aim of this study is to prove the ability of biomarkers to identify patients with the highest risk of non-optimal response during the chemotherapy, and to predict which patients will most likely develop recurrence of disease. Methods: We analyzed 78 patients with epithelial ovarian cancers who underwent surgery in the biennium 2016-2017. All the patients underwent chemotherapy after surgery or interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. Serum levels of HE4 and Ca125 were measured at diagnosis and at each cycle of chemotherapy. We established the degree of response to the treatment by computed tomography scan, and the patients were followed up (median: 10 months). The parameters of progression-free survival and disease-free survival were related to serum levels of biomarkers. Results: Both CA125 and HE4 values became negative at the fourth cycle in the patients with good response to chemotherapy. HE4 increased earlier than Ca125. The parameters that best correlated with a long progression-free survival were: negativization of the marker after the third cycle of chemotherapy (HE4: odds ratio (OR) 5.5; Ca125: OR 9.1) and biomarker serum levels lower than the mean value in the affected population at the time of diagnosis (HE4: OR 3.4; Ca125: OR 3.7). Conclusions: We can conclude that the monitoring of HE4 and Ca125 during chemotherapy, especially at the third cycle, is recommended, because their variation is a good prognostic factor.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 27
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Diagnostic and prognostic role of HE4 expression in multiple carcinomas
    Kumarasamy, Chellan
    Madhav, Madurantakam Royam
    Sabarimurugan, Shanthi
    Lakhotiya, Kartik
    Pandey, Venkatesh
    Priyadharshini, T.
    Baxi, Siddhratha
    Gothandam, K. M.
    Jayaraj, Rama
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (28)
  • [12] Lan Chun-Yan, 2008, Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, V43, P732
  • [13] Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
    Ledermann, J. A.
    Raja, F. A.
    Fotopoulou, C.
    Gonzalez-Martin, A.
    Colombo, N.
    Sessa, C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 : 24 - 32
  • [14] A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass
    Moore, Richard G.
    McMeekin, D. Scott
    Brown, Amy K.
    DiSilvestro, Paul
    Miller, M. Craig
    Allard, W. Jeffrey
    Gajewski, Walter
    Kurman, Robert
    Bast, Robert C., Jr.
    Skates, Steven J.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [15] The Role of HE4 in Ovarian Cancer Follow-up A Review
    Piovano, Elisa
    Attamante, Lorenza
    Macchi, Chiara
    Cavallero, Camilla
    Romagnolo, Cesare
    Maggino, Tiziano
    Landoni, Fabio
    Gadducci, Angiolo
    Sartori, Enrico
    Gion, Massimo
    Zola, Paolo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (08) : 1359 - 1365
  • [16] Does HE4 have a role as biomarker in the recurrence of ovarian cancer?
    Plotti, Francesco
    Capriglione, Stella
    Terranova, Corrado
    Montera, Roberto
    Aloisi, Alessia
    Damiani, Patrizio
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Scaletta, Giuseppe
    Benedetti-Panici, Pierluigi
    Angioli, Roberto
    [J]. TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (06) : 2117 - 2123
  • [17] FIGO's staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: abridged republication
    Prat, Jaime
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (02) : 87 - 89
  • [18] Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum
    Prat, Jaime
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 124 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [19] Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomised trial
    Rustin, Gordon J. S.
    van der Burg, Maria E. L.
    Griffin, Clare L.
    Guthrie, David
    Lamont, Alan
    Jayson, Gordon C.
    Kristensen, Gunnar
    Mediola, Cesar
    Coens, Corneel
    Qian, Wendi
    Parmar, Mahesh K. B.
    Swart, Ann Marie
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 376 (9747) : 1155 - 1163
  • [20] The role of novel biomarker HE4 in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of ovarian cancer: a systematic review
    Scaletta, Giuseppe
    Plotti, Francesco
    Luvero, Daniela
    Capriglione, Stella
    Montera, Roberto
    Miranda, Andrea
    Lopez, Salvatore
    Terranova, Corrado
    Nardone, Carlo De Cicco
    Angioli, Roberto
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2017, 17 (09) : 827 - 839