Ten rules of thumb in contract design: lessons from Danish agriculture

被引：49

作者：

Bogetoft, P ^{[1
]}

Olesen, HB ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Econ & Nat Resources, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

来源：

EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2002年 / 29卷 / 02期

关键词：

contract design; contract theory; agricultural producer; food processor; Denmark;

D O I：

10.1093/eurrag/29.2.185

中图分类号：

F3 [农业经济];

学科分类号：

0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;

摘要：

Real contracts balance a number of conflicting objectives that characterise the contracting situation. Contract theory provides useful insights but the formal models used in theoretical analysis tend to focus on a few effects in stylised environments. The risk of a partial approach is that while improving one aspect of a contract, new and more serious problems may arise in other respects. Practical, theory-based contract design can therefore benefit from a more holistic, systemic approach. In this paper, we offer a checklist that can support such an approach. The checklist combines theory with experiences from Danish agricultural contracts.

引用

页码：185 / 204

页数：20