A comprehensive review of disputes prevention and resolution in construction projects

被引:32
作者
Alaloul, Wesam S. [1 ]
Hasaniyah, Mohammed W. [2 ]
Tayeh, Bassam A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia
[2] Islamic Univ Gaza, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn, Gaza, Palestine
来源
2ND CONFERENCE FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING RESEARCH NETWORKS (CONCERN-2 2018) | 2019年 / 270卷
关键词
CONTRACT;
D O I
10.1051/matecconf/201927005012
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction industry is complex, fragmented, dynamic and involves many parties in an adversarial relationship. This makes disputes almost inevitable in any construction project. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the adopted methodologies in resolving disputes that arise in the construction projects. The paper evaluates and classifies the different methods of disputes resolution. A comparison was conducted between the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The paper distinguishes between the traditional method of disputes resolution; litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods such as arbitration, mediation, med/arb, mini-trial and dispute review board. In conclusion there is no best way to solve all kind of disputes in construction projects, however, a general step by step process of how disputes should be addressed is finally presented.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 66 条
[61]  
Trantina T.L., 2003, ATTORNEYS GUIDE ALTE
[62]   USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY [J].
TREACY, TB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1995, 11 (01) :58-63
[63]  
Wilmot W.W., 2001, Interpersonal conflict
[64]  
Zaneldin E. K., 2006, International Journal of Project Management, V24, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.006
[65]  
Zawawi NAWA, 2011, WIT T ECOL ENV, V150, P675, DOI [10.2495/SDP110561, DOI 10.2495/SDP110561]
[66]  
Zawawi W. A., 2010, SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUC