A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning

被引:423
作者
Parish, Eric J. [1 ]
Duraisamy, Karthik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Data-driven modeling; Machine learning; Closure modeling; UNCERTAINTIES; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.012
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We propose a modeling paradigm, termed field inversion and machine learning (FIML), that seeks to comprehensively harness data from sources such as high-fidelity simulations and experiments to aid the creation of improved closure models for computational physics applications. In contrast to inferring model parameters, this work uses inverse modeling to obtain corrective, spatially distributed functional terms, offering a route to directly address model-form errors. Once the inference has been performed over a number of problems that are representative of the deficient physics in the closure model, machine learning techniques are used to reconstruct the model corrections in terms of variables that appear in the closure model. These reconstructed functional forms are then used to augment the closure model in a predictive computational setting. As a first demonstrative example, a scalar ordinary differential equation is considered, wherein the model equation has missing and deficient terms. Following this, the methodology is extended to the prediction of turbulent channel flow. In both of these applications, the approach is demonstrated to be able to successfully reconstruct functional corrections and yield accurate predictive solutions while providing a measure of model form uncertainties. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 774
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Parameter estimation and inverse problems, DOI DOI 10.1016/C2009-0-61134-X
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, TECHNICAL REPORT
[3]   Quantification of Model Uncertainty: Calibration, Model Discrepancy, and Identifiability [J].
Arendt, Paul D. ;
Apley, Daniel W. ;
Chen, Wei .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2012, 134 (10)
[4]   Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework [J].
Beck, JL ;
Katafygiotis, LS .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 1998, 124 (04) :455-461
[5]   Modeling dynamic controls on ice streams: a Bayesian statistical approach [J].
Berliner, L. M. ;
Jezek, K. ;
Cressie, N. ;
Kim, Y. ;
Lam, C. Q. ;
Van der Veen, Q. .
JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 2008, 54 (187) :705-714
[6]   Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy [J].
Brynjarsdottir, Jenny ;
O'Hagan, Anthony .
INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (11)
[7]  
Caplan P., NUMERICAL COMP UNPUB
[8]   Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling [J].
Cheung, Sai Hung ;
Oliver, Todd A. ;
Prudencio, Ernesto E. ;
Prudhomme, Serge ;
Moser, Robert D. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (09) :1137-1149
[9]   Gaussian process emulation of dynamic computer codes [J].
Conti, S. ;
Gosling, J. P. ;
Oakley, J. E. ;
O'Hagan, A. .
BIOMETRIKA, 2009, 96 (03) :663-676
[10]  
Council N.R., 2012, ASSESSING RELIABILIT