An evaluation of a test-negative design for EV-71 vaccine from a randomized controlled trial

被引:9
作者
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Wei, Mingwei [2 ]
Jin, Pengfei [2 ]
Li, Jingxin [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Fengcai [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Global Hlth, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Prov Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Vaccine Clin Evaluat Dept, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Prov Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, NHC Key Lab Enter Pathogen Microbiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Test-negative design; ev-71; vaccine; vaccine effectiveness;
D O I
10.1080/21645515.2020.1859900
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: The test-negative design has been used widely in evaluation of various vaccines' effectiveness, such as influenza, rotavirus, and so on. Recently, there have been some studies about EV-71 vaccine effectiveness by using test-negative design(TND). However, the validity of the TND application in EV-71 vaccines has not been evaluated. Methods: This study is set upon prior methods to evaluate the validity of TND for influenza vaccine by using a randomized controlled clinical trial database. Vaccine effectiveness estimated by TND (VE-TND) in modified intention-to-treat population (mITT) and per-protocol-set population(PPS) was derived from a large randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial (RCT) of inactivated monovalent EV-71 vaccine in China. Derived VE-TND estimates were compared to the original vaccine efficacy results in RCT (VE-RCT). Results: We totally enrolled 7325 participants who seeked medical care for suspected EV-71 infected diseases during the surveillance. There are no significant differences between cases(test-positive) and controls(test-negative) on sex, age, height, and weight. TND vaccine effectiveness estimates were similar to original RCT vaccine efficacy estimates, both in modified intention-to-treat population and per-protocol populations. Conclusions: This study supports that TND, as an appropriate observational study design is valid to measure EV-71 vaccine effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:2101 / 2106
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] The enteroviruses: Problems in need of treatments
    Abzug, Mark J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2014, 68 : S108 - S114
  • [2] Effectiveness of monovalent and pentavalent rotavirus vaccines in Japanese children
    Araki, Kaoru
    Hara, Megumi
    Tsugawa, Takeshi
    Shimanoe, Chisato
    Nishida, Yuichiro
    Matsuo, Muneaki
    Tanaka, Keitaro
    [J]. VACCINE, 2018, 36 (34) : 5187 - 5193
  • [3] Effectiveness of a monovalent rotavirus vaccine in infants in Malawi after programmatic roll-out: an observational and case-control study
    Bar-Zen, Naor
    Kapanda, Lester
    Tate, Jacqueline E.
    Jere, Khuzwayo C.
    Iturriza-Gomara, Miren
    Nakagomi, Osamu
    Mwansambo, Charles
    Costello, Anthony
    Parashar, Umesh D.
    Heyderman, Robert S.
    French, Neil
    Cunliffe, Nigel A.
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 15 (04) : 422 - 428
  • [4] The Use of Test-negative Controls to Monitor Vaccine Effectiveness A Systematic Review of Methodology
    Chua, Huiying
    Feng, Shuo
    Lewnard, Joseph A.
    Sullivan, Sheena G.
    Blyth, Christopher C.
    Lipsitch, Marc
    Cowling, Benjamin J.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (01) : 43 - 64
  • [5] De Serres G., 2013, EURO SURVEILLANCE B
  • [6] Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During the 2016-2017 Season
    Flannery, Brendan
    Chung, Jessie R.
    Monto, Arnold S.
    Martin, Emily T.
    Belongia, Edward A.
    McLean, Huong Q.
    Gaglani, Manjusha
    Murthy, Kempapura
    Zimmerman, Richard K.
    Nowalk, Mary Patricia
    Jackson, Michael L.
    Jackson, Lisa A.
    Rolfes, Melissa A.
    Spencer, Sarah
    Fry, Alicia M.
    Petrie, Joshua G.
    Malosh, Ryan E.
    McSpadden, E. J.
    Segaloff, Hannah E.
    Cheng, Caroline K.
    Truscon, Rachel
    Johnson, Emileigh
    Lamerato, Lois E.
    Ivacic, Lynn C.
    King, Jennifer P.
    Meece, Jennifer K.
    Palmquist, Madalyn M.
    Guzinski, Sherri A.
    Robertson, Anne
    Kossie, Ashley
    Smith, Michael
    Hoelscher, Vanessa
    Clipper, Lydia
    Walker, Kimberley
    Volz, Marcus
    Rao, Arundhati
    Fader, Robert
    Munoz-Maldonado, Yolanda
    Reis, Michael
    Williams, John V.
    Balasubramani, Goundappa K.
    Reis, Evelyn C.
    Eng, Heather
    Ford, Samantha
    Bear, Todd M.
    Ricci, Edmund M.
    Hickey, Robert W.
    Moehling, Krissy K.
    Raviotta, Jonathan M.
    Sax, Theresa M.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 68 (11) : 1798 - 1806
  • [7] The case test-negative design for studies of the effectiveness of influenza vaccine
    Foppa, Ivo M.
    Haber, Michael
    Ferdinands, Jill M.
    Shay, David K.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2013, 31 (30) : 3104 - 3109
  • [8] Basic principles of test-negative design in evaluating influenza vaccine effectiveness
    Fukushima, Wakaba
    Hirota, Yoshio
    [J]. VACCINE, 2017, 35 (36) : 4796 - 4800
  • [9] A comparative analysis of immunogenicity and safety of an enterovirus 71 vaccine between children aged 3-5 years and infants aged 6-35 months
    Gu, Wei
    Zeng, Gang
    Hu, Yue-mei
    Hu, Yuan-Sheng
    Zhang, Ying
    Hu, Ya-ling
    Wang, Yang
    Li, Jing-Xin
    Zhu, Feng-Cai
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2018, 17 (03) : 257 - 262
  • [10] Jackson ML, 2017, NEW ENGL J MED, V377, P534, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1700153, 10.1056/nejmoa1700153]