Comparative safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab to tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapy for Crohn's disease

被引:57
作者
Bohm, Matthew
Xu, Ronghui
Zhang, Yiran
Varma, Sashidhar
Fischer, Monika
Kochhar, Gursimran
Boland, Brigid
Singh, Siddharth
Hirten, Robert
Ungaro, Ryan
Shmidt, Eugenia
Lasch, Karen
Jairaith, Vipul
Hudesman, David
Chang, Shannon
Lukin, Dana
Swaminath, Arun
Sands, Bruce E.
Colombel, Jean-Frederic
Kane, Sunanda
Loftus, Edward V., Jr.
Shen, Bo
Siegel, Corey A.
Sandborn, William J.
Dulai, Parambir S.
机构
[1] Indianapolis, IN
[2] La Jolla, CA
[3] Cleveland, OH
[4] New York, NY
[5] Minneapolis, MN
[6] Deerfield, IL
[7] London, ON
[8] Rochester, MN
[9] Lebanon, NH
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; COMBINATION THERAPY; VARIABLE SELECTION; OUTCOMES; IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/apt.15921
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Direct comparisons are lacking between vedolizumab and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonist therapy in Crohn's disease (CD). Aim To compare safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab and TNF-antagonist therapy in adult CD patients. Methods Retrospective observational cohort (May 2014-December 2017) propensity score-weighted comparison of vedolizumab vs TNF-antagonist therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab) in CD. Propensity scores were weighted for age, prior treatments, disease complications, extent and severity, steroid dependence, and concomitant immunosuppressive drug use. The primary outcome was comparative risk for infections or non-infectious serious adverse events (requiring antibiotics, antivirals, antifungals, hospitalisation, or treatment discontinuation, or resulting in death). Secondary comparative effectiveness outcomes were clinical remission (resolution of CD-related symptoms), steroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic remission (absence of ulcers/erosions). Results We included 1266 patients (n = 659 vedolizumab). Rates of non-infectious serious adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 0.072, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.012-0.242), but not serious infections (OR 1.183, 95% CI 0.786-1.795), were significantly lower with vedolizumab vs TNF-antagonist therapy. Safety comparisons for non-infectious serious adverse events remained significant after adjusting for differences in duration of exposure. No significant difference was observed between vedolizumab and TNF-antagonist therapy for clinical remission (hazard ratio [HR] 0.932, 95% CI 0.707-1.228), steroid-free clinical remission (HR 1.250, 95% CI 0.677-2.310) or endoscopic remission (HR 0.827, 95% CI 0.595-1.151). TNF-antagonist therapy was associated with higher treatment persistence compared with vedolizumab. Conclusions There was a lower risk of non-infectious serious adverse events, but not serious infections, with vedolizumab vs TNF-antagonist therapy, with no significant difference for achieving disease remission.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 681
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Developing and Applying the Propensity Score to Make Causal Inferences: Variable Selection and Stratification [J].
Adelson, Jill L. ;
McCoach, D. B. ;
Rogers, H. J. ;
Adelson, Jonathan A. ;
Sauer, Timothy M. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
[2]   The benefit of combination therapy depends on disease phenotype and duration in Crohn's disease [J].
Ananthakrishnan, A. N. ;
Sakuraba, A. ;
Barnes, E. L. ;
Pekow, J. ;
Raffals, L. ;
Long, M. D. ;
Sandler, R. S. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 46 (02) :162-168
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, POWER CALCULATOR BIN
[4]   The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating absolute effects of treatments on survival outcomes: A simulation study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Schuster, Tibor .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (05) :2214-2237
[5]   Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (30) :3949-3967
[6]   The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (07) :1242-1258
[7]   The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (16) :2837-2849
[8]   Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 10 (02) :150-161
[9]   Review article: predictors of response to vedolizumab and ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Barre, A. ;
Colombel, J. -F. ;
Ungaro, R. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 47 (07) :896-905
[10]   Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making [J].
Berger, Marc L. ;
Sox, Harold ;
Willke, Richard J. ;
Brixner, Diana L. ;
Eichler, Hans-Georg ;
Goettsch, Wim ;
Madigan, David ;
Makady, Amr ;
Schneeweiss, Sebastian ;
Tarricone, Rosanna ;
Wang, Shirley V. ;
Watkins, John ;
Mullins, C. Daniel .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (08) :1003-1008