Heavy metal removal from aqueous solution using sodium alginate immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria: Mechanism and process optimization

被引:70
作者
Kiran, Mothe Gopi [1 ]
Pakshirajan, Kannan [1 ,2 ]
Das, Gopal [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Guwahati, Ctr Environm, Gauhati 781039, Assam, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Guwahati, Dept Biosci & Bioengn, Gauhati 781039, Assam, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Guwahati, Dept Chem, Gauhati 781039, Assam, India
关键词
Immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria; Sodium alginate beads; Sulfide precipitation; Heavy metals; Packed column reactor; ACID-MINE DRAINAGE; GRANULAR SLUDGE REACTOR; DESULFOVIBRIO-DESULFURICANS; BED REACTOR; TOXICITY; REDUCTION; BIOREACTORS; WATER; BIOREMEDIATION; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Heavy metal removal was evaluated using sodium alginate immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) under batch and continuous mode. Under batch conditions, more than 95% metal removal was achieved due to formation of insoluble metal sulfides exterior to the bead surface. Best heavy metal removal results were obtained at 48 h hydraulic retention time (HRT). Metal loading rate values upto 2.20 mg/L.h for Fe(III), Zn(II), Cd(ll), Pb(II) and Ni(II) and upto 4.29 mg/L.h for Cu(II) were proved to be favorable for their removal using the continuous downflow column reactor packed with the immobilized SRB beads. Continuous metal removal from a mixture of the heavy metals showed that Cu(II) removal was maximum (99%), followed by Zn(II) (95.8%) and other metals at their respective low inlet concentrations. However, the removal values were reduced at a high inlet concentration of these metals, which matched well with low COD and sulfate reduction values. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 496
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   Comparison of single and joint effects of Zn and Cu in continuous flow and batch reactors [J].
Sengoer, Sema Sevinc ;
Gikas, Petros ;
Moberly, James G. ;
Peyton, Brent M. ;
Ginn, Timothy R. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 87 (03) :374-380
[42]  
Shete N.P., 2013, Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol, V3, P1611, DOI DOI 10.1075/TARGET.18.2.05SHI
[43]  
Sohnel O., 1992, PRECIPITATION BASIC
[44]  
Tucker MD, 1998, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V60, P88, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981005)60:1<88::AID-BIT10>3.0.CO
[45]  
2-4
[46]   Toxicity of metals and metal mixtures: analysis of concentration and time dependence for zinc and copper [J].
Utgikar, VP ;
Chaudhary, N ;
Koeniger, A ;
Tabak, HH ;
Haines, JR ;
Govind, R .
WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (17) :3651-3658
[47]   Inhibition of sulfate-reducing bacteria by metal sulfide formation in bioremediation of acid mine drainage [J].
Utgikar, VP ;
Harmon, SM ;
Chaudhary, N ;
Tabak, HH ;
Govind, R ;
Haines, JR .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 17 (01) :40-48
[48]   Acute toxicity of heavy metals to acetate-utilizing mixed cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria: EC100 and EC50 [J].
Utgikar, VP ;
Chen, BY ;
Chaudhary, N ;
Tabak, HH ;
Haines, JR ;
Govind, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2001, 20 (12) :2662-2669
[49]   Effect of process variables on the sulfate reduction process in bioreactors treating metal-containing wastewaters: factorial design and response surface analyses [J].
Villa-Gomez, D. K. ;
Pakshirajan, K. ;
Maestro, R. ;
Mushi, S. ;
Lens, P. N. L. .
BIODEGRADATION, 2015, 26 (04) :299-311
[50]  
Widdel F., 1988, BIOL ANAEROBIC MICRO, P469