Rash to the mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Ramirez-Fort, Marigdalia K. [1 ]
Case, Emily C. [2 ]
Rosen, Alyx C. [2 ]
Cerci, Felipe B. [4 ]
Wu, Shenhong [3 ]
Lacouture, Mario E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Dermatol Serv, New York, NY 10022 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] Hosp Santa Casa de Misericordia Curitiba PUC PR, Dept Dermatol, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2014年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
everolimus; skin rash; mTOR inhibitor; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; MAMMALIAN TARGET; PHASE-II; BREAST-CANCER; TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; EGFR INHIBITORS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; IN-VITRO; RAPAMYCIN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/COC.0b013e318277d62f
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor approved for treatment of renal cell carcinoma, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, breast cancer, and progressive neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin. Its use may be hindered because of adverse events, including rash. The reported incidence and risk of a rash to everolimus varies widely and has not been closely investigated. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to determine the incidence and risk of developing a rash. Methods: We searched PubMed and Web of Science databases and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology from 1998 to December 2011 using the keyword "everolimus" to identify relevant clinical trials. Eligible studies included prospective phase II and III clinical trials of cancer patients on 10 mg of everolimus daily with available data on incidence of rash. The summary incidence and relative risk (RR) of rash were calculated using either the random-effects or fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity of the constituent studies. Results: A total of 2242 patients with various malignancies from 13 clinical trials were included in the analysis. The summary incidences of all-grade and high-grade rash in patients on everolimus were 28.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.8-38.0] and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.6-1.8), respectively. Everolimus was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of all-grade rash (RR = 3.853, 95% CI, 2.470-6.013, P = 0.000), but the RR for high-grade rash (RR = 2.997, 95% CI, 0.633-14.185) was not statistically significant, with a P value of 0.166. Conclusions: Everolimus is associated with a significant risk of developing a rash. Management of rash to everolimus is critical to prevent dose modifications and decreased quality of life, both of which can negatively affect overall clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 271
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Failure of scabies treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Morgan, Rebecca L.
    Mertz, Dominik
    Motaghi, Shahrzad
    Ghadimi, Maryam
    Babatunde, Ifeoluwa
    Zani, Babalwa
    Pasumarthi, Tejanth
    Derby, Mckenzie
    Kothapudi, Venkata N.
    Palmer, Nicole R.
    Aebischer, Anton
    Harder, Thomas
    Reichert, Felix
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 190 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [42] Adiposity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, En
    Kirley, Jocelyn
    Feliciano, Elizabeth M. Cespedes
    Caan, Bette J.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2022, 33 (10) : 1219 - 1246
  • [43] Ayurvedic interventions for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kessler, Christian S.
    Pinders, Lea
    Michalsen, Andreas
    Cramer, Holger
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 35 (02) : 211 - 232
  • [44] The effect of kinesiotaping on edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alcantara, Denise Alves de Almeida
    dos Santos, Francielly Natanaelly Andrade
    Ferreira, Jose Jamacy de Almeida
    de Noronha, Marcos
    de Andrade, Palloma Rodrigues
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2024, 74
  • [45] FDG uptake is a surrogate marker for defining the optimal biological dose of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in vivo
    Cejka, D.
    Kuntner, C.
    Preusser, M.
    Fritzer-Szekeres, M.
    Fueger, B. J.
    Strommer, S.
    Werzowa, J.
    Fuereder, T.
    Wanek, T.
    Zsebedics, M.
    Mueller, M.
    Langer, O.
    Wacheck, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 100 (11) : 1739 - 1745
  • [46] Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nielsen, Dorte Lisbet
    Juhl, Carsten Bogh
    Nielsen, Ole Haagen
    Chen, Inna Markovna
    Herrmann, Joerg
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (10) : 1390 - 1399
  • [47] Characteristics and Outcomes of Fetal Cardiac Rhabdomyoma With or Without mTOR Inhibitors, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mustafa, Hiba J.
    Javinani, Ali
    Morning, Makayla L.
    D'Antonio, Francesco
    Pagani, Giorgio
    Puranik, Poonam M.
    Khalil, Asma
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2024, 44 (10) : 1251 - 1267
  • [48] Meta-analysis of stomatitis in clinical studies of everolimus: incidence and relationship with efficacy
    Rugo, H. S.
    Hortobagyi, G. N.
    Yao, J.
    Pavel, M.
    Ravaud, A.
    Franz, D.
    Ringeisen, F.
    Gallo, J.
    Rouyrre, N.
    Anak, O.
    Motzer, R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (03) : 519 - 525
  • [49] Infections after kidney transplantation: A comparison of mTOR-Is and CNIs as basic immunosuppressants. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wolf, Sebastian
    Lauseker, Michael
    Schiergens, Tobias
    Wirth, Ulrich
    Drefs, Moritz
    Renz, Bernhard
    Ryll, Martin
    Bucher, Julian
    Werner, Jens
    Guba, Markus
    Andrassy, Joachim
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2020, 22 (03)
  • [50] Pulmonary complications with the use of mTOR inhibitors in targeted cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Benjamin A. Gartrell
    Jian Ying
    Shanthi Sivendran
    Kenneth M. Boucher
    Toni K. Choueiri
    Guru Sonpavde
    William K. Oh
    Neeraj Agarwal
    Matthew D. Galsky
    Targeted Oncology, 2014, 9 : 195 - 204