Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial

被引:3
作者
Borkar, Amol [1 ]
Shah, Amit [1 ]
Gudi, Anil [1 ]
Homburg, Roy [1 ]
机构
[1] Homerton Univ Hosp, Fertil Unit, London, England
关键词
IVF; Mock embryo transfer; Pregnancy outcomes; Live birth; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; TRANSFER CATHETER; PREGNANCY RATE; IMPLANTATION; DIFFICULT; IMPACT; RATES; BLOOD;
D O I
10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycle has not been evaluated. Objective: To find out the effect of MET before the first IVF cycle on clinical pregnancy rate. Materials and Methods: This is a single-centre randomized controlled trial with a balanced randomization (1:1), carried out between November 2015 and October 2017, with 200 subjects at Homerton university hospital, London, randomized into either MET or control. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (detection of heart activity on the ultrasound scan), the secondary outcome measures were live birth rate, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates, difficult ETs, rate of blood or mucus on the catheter tip. Results: No significant differences were observed in the baseline or cycle characteristics between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate was similar between the MET and control groups based on both intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.98, p = 0.92, respectively). Additionally, no significant difference was seen in the live birth rate in both groups on intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.67, p = 0.47), respectively. Conclusion: Our study concludes that MET prior to first IVF cycle may not improve the success rate in young women without risk factors for a difficult embryo transfer.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 960
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer [J].
Alvero, R ;
Hearns-Stokes, RM ;
Catherino, WH ;
Leondires, MP ;
Segars, JH .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (09) :1848-1852
[2]   Contamination of embryo transfer catheter and treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization [J].
Awonuga, A ;
Nabi, A ;
Govindbhai, J ;
Birch, H ;
Stewart, B .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1998, 15 (04) :198-201
[3]  
Brough P, 2016, ROUTL FRONT CRIMINOL, V32, P1
[4]   Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: summary of the evidence and new perspectives. A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cozzolino, Mauro ;
Vitagliano, Amerigo ;
Di Giovanni, Maria Valentina ;
Lagana, Antonio Simone ;
Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni ;
Blaganje, Mija ;
Staric, Kristina Drusany ;
Borut, Kobal ;
Patrelli, Tito Silvio ;
Noventa, Marco .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 36 (05) :524-542
[5]   Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer [J].
Goudas, VT ;
Hammitt, DG ;
Damario, MA ;
Session, DR ;
Singh, AP ;
Dumesic, DA .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 70 (05) :878-882
[6]   Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer [J].
Henne, MB ;
Milki, AA .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (03) :570-572
[7]   Local injury to the endometrium on the day of oocyte retrieval has a negative impact on implantation in assisted reproductive cycles: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Karimzade, Mohammad Ali ;
Oskouian, Homa ;
Ahmadi, Shahnaz ;
Oskouian, Leila .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2010, 281 (03) :499-503
[8]   Does the timing of mock embryo transfer affect in vitro fertilization implantation and pregnancy rates? [J].
Katariya, Kathleen O. ;
Bates, G. Wright ;
Robinson, Randal D. ;
Arthur, Nancy J. ;
Propst, Anthony M. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 (05) :1462-1464
[9]  
Kava-Braverman A, 2017, FERTIL STERIL, V107, P657, DOI [10.1016/.fertnstert.2016.11.020, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.020]
[10]  
LEETON J, 1982, FERTIL STERIL, V38, P156