How adoption of coping behaviors determines construction workers' safety: A quantitative and qualitative investigation

被引:51
作者
Liang, Qi [1 ]
Leung, Mei-yung [2 ]
Ahmed, Khursheed [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Geomat, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Kowloon Tong, Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Construction workers; Coping behaviors; Mixed research methods; Safety; Stress; OCCUPATIONAL STRESS; EMOTIONAL-APPROACH; HEALTH-PROBLEMS; JOB DEMANDS; STRATEGIES; CLIMATE; PROFESSIONALS; METAANALYSIS; EXPERIENCES; OPERATIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105035
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Safety problems have long been prominent in the construction industry, with huge numbers of injuries and fatal incidents annually among construction workers. Construction workers also suffer high levels of stress, and unmanageable stress can lead to problems of reduced safety. Although coping behaviors are the key in the stress management process, little research has been conducted to investigate the effect of coping behaviors on construction workers' stress and safety. The current study applied mixed research methods to fill this research gap. Over three hundred construction workers participated in a questionnaire survey, and another 24 were interviewed. Using methodological research triangulation, a Coping Behaviors-Stress-Safety model was established for construction workers, which demonstrated that 1) different types of problem-focused coping behaviors have varying effects on construction workers' stress, with proactive coping reducing but confrontive coping escalating their stress; 2) three out of four emotion-focused behaviors consistently spur emotional and physical stress in construction workers; 3) seeking emotional support behaviors were found to not affect the workers' stress and safety; 4) higher levels of stress could promote safety incompliance; and 5) the adoption of proactive coping and planful problem-solving could directly improve construction workers' safety participation, while avoidance behavior triggers safety incompliance. Practical recommendations are made to facilitate the adoption of effective coping behaviors by construction workers, including team-building exercises, safety empowerment and stress management programs. The findings could enhance our understanding of stress management and imply an alternative way to improve health and safety in the construction industry.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 102 条
[31]  
Di Martino V., 1992, CONDITIONS WORK DIGE
[32]   Prospects for a Clinical Science of Mindfulness-Based Intervention [J].
Dimidjian, Sona ;
Segal, Zindel V. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 70 (07) :593-620
[33]   A deep hybrid learning model to detect unsafe behavior: Integrating convolution neural networks and long short-term memory [J].
Ding, Lieyun ;
Fang, Weili ;
Luo, Hanbin ;
Love, Peter E. D. ;
Zhong, Botao ;
Ouyang, Xi .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 86 :118-124
[34]   Safety climate and beyond: A multi-level multi-climate framework [J].
Dov, Zohar .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (03) :376-387
[35]   An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Safety Climate on Safety Citizenship Behavior in Coal Mine [J].
Du Xuesheng ;
Zhao Xintao .
ISMSSE 2011, 2011, 26
[36]  
Duncan G.J., 2004, Research in Human Development, V1, P59, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15427617RHD010125, DOI 10.1080/15427609.2004.9683330]
[37]   The qualitative content analysis process [J].
Elo, Satu ;
Kyngaes, Helvi .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) :107-115
[38]   Enhancing the safety of construction crew by accounting for brain resource requirements of activities in job assignment [J].
Fini, Alireza Ahmadian Fard ;
Akbarnezhad, Ali ;
Rashidi, Taha H. ;
Waller, S. Travis .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 88 :31-43
[39]   Stress, coping, and hope [J].
Folkman, Susan .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2010, 19 (09) :901-908
[40]   Conditions affecting safety on the Swedish railway - Train drivers' experiences and perceptions [J].
Forsberg, Rebecca .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2016, 85 :53-59