Reproduction in a declining population of wild turkeys in Arkansas

被引:24
作者
Thogmartin, WE
Johnson, JE
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Biol Sci, Arkansas Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, US Geol Survey,Biol Resources Div, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Biol Sci, US Geol Survey,Biol Resources Div, Arkansas Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
Arkansas; hen success; Meleagris gallopavo; nest predation; nesting success; physiological condition; poult survival; wild turkey;
D O I
10.2307/3802846
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) abundance in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas has declined since 1987. We studied reproductive output of 106 radiotagged hens from 1993 to 1996 to understand factors likely responsible for this decline. Low rates of initiation of incubation (65% for adult and 53% for subadult hens), low nesting success (13%), and small clutch sizes (9.0/adult hen, 7.8/subadult hen) characterized the population. Mean hen success was 0.20 for adult hens and 0.10 for subadult hens. Survival of poults (34% at 2 weeks posthatch) and hens during the breeding season (Kaplan-Meier survival estimates = 74.8% for adults and 79.1% for subadults) was likely not responsible for the population decline. Heavier hens laid larger clutches and presumably entered the nesting season in better condition, leading to earlier initiation of incubation and greater probability of successful nesting. Hens entering the nesting season in poor condition reduced clutch size investment or delayed nesting. Management efforts aimed at increasing hen condition prior to nesting could produce increases in reproduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1290
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   NUTRIENT-RESERVE DYNAMICS AND DIET OF BREEDING FEMALE GADWALLS [J].
ANKNEY, CD ;
ALISAUSKAS, RT .
CONDOR, 1991, 93 (04) :799-810
[2]   Habitat sampling and habitat selection by female wild turkeys: Ecological correlates and reproductive consequences [J].
Badyaev, AV ;
Martin, TE ;
Etges, WJ .
AUK, 1996, 113 (03) :636-646
[3]  
BAILEY W, 1980, P NATL WILD TURKEY S, V4, P10
[4]   EFFECTS OF DIETARY-PROTEIN LEVELS ON RUFFED GROUSE REPRODUCTION [J].
BECKERTON, PR ;
MIDDLETON, ALA .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1982, 46 (03) :569-579
[5]  
BIDWELL T G, 1988, Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, V68, P59
[6]   HABITAT USE BY FEMALE EASTERN WILD TURKEYS IN SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA [J].
BIDWELL, TG ;
SHALAWAY, SD ;
MAUGHAN, OE ;
TALENT, LG .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (01) :34-39
[7]  
Cain MD, 1998, WILDLIFE SOC B, V26, P209
[8]  
DAVIS JR, 1959, P NATL WILD TURKEY S, V1, P138
[9]  
DRENT RH, 1980, ARDEA, V68, P225
[10]   DEMOGRAPHIC-ANALYSIS OF A RIO-GRANDE TURKEY POPULATION [J].
GLAZENER, WC ;
RANSOM, D ;
CARY, JR ;
RONGSTAD, OJ .
SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST, 1990, 35 (01) :23-27