Calibration of TLD-100 powder by energies of 60Co, 137Cs, 192Ir and RX of 250, 50 kVp in a dose absorbed in water with aims to control the dosimetric quality by high dosage rate brachytherapy

被引:0
作者
Calderon, S. P. Loaiza
Romero, J. T. Alvarez
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Estado Mexico, Programa Maestria Fis Med, Mexico City 50180, DF, Mexico
[2] ININ, Dept Metrol, LSCD, Mexico City 52750, DF, Mexico
关键词
TL dosimetry; TLD-100; brachytherapy; HDR; absorbed dose to waters Ir-192;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
To help solve the traceability and quality control dosimetric problems for the users of Ir-192 Sources in the Mexican Republic, the Secondary Standard Dosimetric Laboratory at ININ to calibrated a batch of powder TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti) in terms of absorbed dose to water D,, for the following radiation sources: (CO)-C-60, Cs-137 and RX 250 and 50 kVp. Later on, the calibration is interpolated to obtain file 192 In The calibration radiation field is carried out with the following protocols: For the Co-60, OIEA TRS 399 protocol employing a secondary standard Farmer chamber PTW N30013, calibrated on D-w at the NRC (Canada). For Cs-137 the AAPM TG 43 protocol is used, in terms of air kerma strength S-k determined by the air kerma K-a measured with a secondary standard chamber type thimble NE2611 traceable to the NIST (USA). For Rays X 250 and 50 kVp, the protocol AAPM TG 61 using a tertiary standard Farmer chamber PTW 30001, with traceability to the LCIE (France) on air kerma K-a. The calibration curves are built for the TLD response R-TLD vs D-w, they are fitted by means of a least squares fit technique with a second degree polynomial that corrects the supralinearity response. The Curves are validated by the lack of fit test, and the Anderson Darling normality test. Later on, the sensibility factors are interpolated for the Sources of Ir-192: MicroSelectron and VariSource. Two capsules are sent to two hospitals to verify a nominal D-w = 2 Gy, in the first one an underestimate of the D-w is obtained, and in other one ail overestimation is presented. Finally, the expanded uncertainty associated to D-W and the F-s are calculated.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 421
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
AGUIRRE JF, 2002, IAEACN96
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Applied regression analysis, DOI 10.1002/9781118625590
[3]  
Borg J., 1999, MONTE CARLO CALCULAT
[4]   Monte Carlo calculations of dose rate distributions around the Amersham CDCS-M-type 137Cs source [J].
Casal, E ;
Ballester, F ;
Lluch, JL ;
Pérez-Calatayud, J ;
Lliso, F .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (01) :132-140
[5]  
HEO G, 2001, STAT 252 INTRO APPL, V2, pCH8
[6]   Theory of thermoluminescence gamma dose response: The unified interaction model [J].
Horowitz, YS .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2001, 184 (1-2) :68-84
[7]  
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2000, TECHN REP SER, V398
[8]   The IAEA/WHO TLD postal programme for radiotherapy hospitals [J].
Izewska, J ;
Andreo, P .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 54 (01) :65-72
[9]  
Johns H.E., 1983, PHYS RADIOLOGY
[10]  
KURI P, 2003, CANC MEXICO