A comparative analysis of particle swarm optimization and differential evolution algorithms for parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamic systems

被引:19
作者
Banerjee, Amit [1 ]
Abu-Mahfouz, Issam [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Sch Sci Engn & Technol, Middletown, PA 17057 USA
关键词
CHAOTIC SYSTEMS; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; HYSTERETIC SYSTEMS; IDENTIFICATION; LASERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chaos.2013.11.004
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The use of evolutionary algorithms has been popular in recent years for solving the inverse problem of identifying system parameters given the chaotic response of a dynamical system. The inverse problem is reformulated as a minimization problem and population-based optimizers such as evolutionary algorithms have been shown to be efficient solvers of the minimization problem. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no published work that evaluates the efficacy of using the two most popular evolutionary techniques - particle swarm optimization and differential evolution algorithm, on a wide range of parameter estimation problems. In this paper, the two methods along with their variants (for a total of seven algorithms) are applied to fifteen different parameter estimation problems of varying degrees of complexity. Estimation results are analyzed using nonparametric statistical methods to identify if an algorithm is statistically superior to others over the class of problems analyzed. Results based on parameter estimation quality suggest that there are significant differences between the algorithms with the newer, more sophisticated algorithms performing better than their canonical versions. More importantly, significant differences were also found among variants of the particle swarm optimizer and the best performing differential evolution algorithm. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 83
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Application of memetic algorithm in modelling discrete-time multivariable dynamics systems [J].
Ahmad, Robiah ;
Jamaluddin, Hishamuddin ;
Hussain, Mohd. Azan .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2008, 22 (07) :1595-1609
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, 2001 P AAZV AAWV ARA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIO
[4]   Chaotic aspects of lasers with host-induced nonlinearity and its control [J].
Banerjee, S ;
Saha, P ;
Chowdhury, AR .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2001, 291 (2-3) :103-114
[5]   Parameter identification of chaotic systems using evolutionary programming approach [J].
Chang, Jen-Fuh ;
Yang, Yi-Sung ;
Liao, Teh-Lu ;
Yan, Jun-Juh .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 35 (04) :2074-2079
[6]   An improved real-coded genetic algorithm for parameters estimation of nonlinear systems [J].
Chang, WD .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2006, 20 (01) :236-246
[7]   Identification of Bouc-Wen hysteretic systems by a hybrid evolutionary algorithm [J].
Charalampakis, A. E. ;
Koumousis, V. K. .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2008, 314 (3-5) :571-585
[8]   Identification of structural systems by neural networks [J].
Chassiakos, AG ;
Masri, SF .
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 1996, 40 (5-6) :637-656
[9]   Synchronization of an uncertain unified chaotic system via adaptive control [J].
Chen, SH ;
Lü, JH .
CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2002, 14 (04) :643-647
[10]   Two improved differential evolution schemes for faster global search [J].
Das, Swagatam ;
Konar, Amit ;
Chakraborty, Uday K. .
GECCO 2005: GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, :991-998