Race and Redistricting

被引:6
作者
Canon, David T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Polit Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Congress; race; redistricting; representation; state legislatures; Voting Rights Act; VOTING-RIGHTS ACT; MAJORITY-MINORITY DISTRICTS; DESCRIPTIVE REPRESENTATION; SUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION; POLITICAL REPRESENTATION; ECOLOGICAL INFERENCE; FIELD EXPERIMENT; SUPPLY-SIDE; BLACK; LEGISLATORS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-d02107
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This review examines the role of race in the decennial process of redistricting. I review the scholarly literature on three related questions: What role should racial redistricting play in the representation of racial interests, how may racial redistricting be used, and what is the connection between racial redistricting and the substantive representation of racial minorities? The review briefly examines the normative question of racial representation and then focuses on the last two topics: empirical research on how racial interests are represented in legislatures and legal questions concerning the use of redistricting to produce descriptive representation. Racial redistricting enhances the representation of racial interests in legislatures, and the legal status of the districts is complex; therefore, litigation will proceed on a heavily fact-based, case-by-case basis in which political scientists will continue to play a vital role with their research on racially polarized voting and representation.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 528
页数:20
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Shelby County v. Holder
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1965, VOTING RIGHTS ACT VR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Bush v. Vera
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ASHCROFT V GEORGIA 5
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1960, Gomillion v. Lightfoot
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CLASSIFYING RACE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1980, City of Mobile v. Bolden
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Thornburg v. Gingles
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Abrams v. Johnson, 521U.S.74,82