Does Urgent Colonoscopy Improve Outcomes in the Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding?

被引:29
作者
Seth, Ankur [1 ]
Khan, Muhammad Ali [2 ]
Nollan, Richard [3 ]
Gupta, Deepansh [1 ]
Kamal, Sehrish [1 ]
Singh, Utkarsh [1 ]
Kamal, Falsal [1 ]
Howden, Colin W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 956 Court Ave,Suite H210, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr Lib, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
Colonoscopy; Hematochezia; Lower gastrointestinal bleeding; HOSPITAL STAY; HEMORRHAGE; EXPERIENCE; RECURRENCE; QUALITY; THERAPY; UTILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjms.2016.11.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Colonoscopy continues to be an essential diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). Studies that have evaluated the role of urgent colonoscopy for treating LGIB have reached conflicting conclusions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of urgent colonoscopy in several outcomes in patients with LGIB. We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases from inception to July 10, 2016 for comparative studies evaluating the role of urgent versus elective colonoscopy in the management of LGIB. We evaluated mortality, rate of rebleeding, length of stay in hospital, identification of bleeding source, stigmata of recent hemorrhage and need for surgery. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous variables whereas standard mean differences were calculated for continuous variables. We assessed quality using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. We used the GRADE framework to interpret our findings. A total of 6 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies) with 23,419 patients (9,498 urgent colonoscopy and 13,921 elective colonoscopy) were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled ORs with 95% CI for mortality, rebleeding and identification of bleeding source were 0.84 (0.46-1.53), 1.18 (0.64-2.16) and 1.49 (0.86-2.59), respectively. Stigmata of recent hemorrhage were more readily identified with urgent colonoscopy OR 2.85 (1.90-4.28). There were no differences in requirement for surgery, length of hospital stay or rate of endoscopic intervention. However, these effect sizes were limited by considerable heterogeneity, which was probably due to studies being conducted in different countries having different criteria for discharge and on variations in the type of endoscopic therapy for stigmata of recent hemorrhage. In conclusion, among patients with acute LGIB, there is no evidence that urgent colonoscopy reduces mortality, rebleeding or requirement for surgery or that it improves the rate of identification of the bleeding source. However, urgent colonoscopy does increase the rate of detection of stigmata of recent hemorrhage.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 306
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Utility of urgent colonoscopy in acute lower gastro-intestinal bleeding: a single-center experience [J].
Albeldawi, Mazen ;
Ha, Duc ;
Mehta, Paresh ;
Lopez, Rocio ;
Jang, Sunguk ;
Sanaka, Madhusudhan R. ;
Vargo, John J. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2014, 2 (04) :300-305
[2]   The utility of urgent colonoscopy in the evaluation of acute lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding: A 2-year experience from a single center [J].
Angtuaco, TL ;
Reddy, SK ;
Drapkin, S ;
Harrell, LE ;
Howden, CW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 96 (06) :1782-1785
[3]   Recurrence and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding [J].
Aoki, Tomonori ;
Nagata, Naoyoshi ;
Niikura, Ryota ;
Shimbo, Takuro ;
Tanaka, Shohei ;
Sekine, Katsunori ;
Kishida, Yoshihiro ;
Watanabe, Kazuhiro ;
Sakurai, Toshiyuki ;
Yokoi, Chizu ;
Akiyama, Junichi ;
Yanase, Mikio ;
Mizokami, Masashi ;
Uemurak, Naomi .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 13 (03) :488-494
[4]   ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY FOR ACUTE NONVARICEAL UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
GUYATT, GH ;
SALENA, BJ ;
LAINE, LA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 102 (01) :139-148
[5]  
DeeksJJ AltmanD, 2008, COCHRANEHANDBOOKFORS
[6]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[7]   Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: summary of NICE guidance [J].
Dworzynski, Katharina ;
Pollit, Vicki ;
Kelsey, Amy ;
Higgins, Bernard ;
Palmer, Kelvin .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
[8]   Endoscopic hemostasis is rarely used for hematochezia: a population-based study from the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopic Database [J].
Fisher, Osnat Ron-Tal ;
Gralnek, Ian M. ;
Eisen, Glenn M. ;
Williams, J. Luke ;
Holub, Jennifer L. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 79 (02) :317-325
[9]   Urgent colonoscopy for evaluation and management of acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Green, BT ;
Rockey, DC ;
Portwood, G ;
Tarnasky, PR ;
Guarisco, S ;
Branch, MS ;
Leung, J ;
Jowell, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (11) :2395-2402
[10]   GRADE:: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [J].
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7650) :924-926