Urban infrastructure financing and delivery in India and China

被引:6
作者
Mahadevia, Darshini
机构
[1] School of Planning, Center for Environmental Planning and Technology
关键词
urban; infrastructure financing; China; India;
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-124X.2006.00017.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This comparison is not restricted to Mumbai and Shanghai but also to Bangalore and Hangzhou, Delhi and Beijing and so on. The Chinese and Indian economies are expected to be the growth engines of the global economy. In this process cities are expected to play an important role, through their transformation into "World Class" cities, a term now doing rounds in the policy circles in Mumbai, to be achieved through massive infrastructure investments made in them. In China, this has been possible because of the decentralized administrative and fiscal system in China. In contrast, in India, the system of urban infrastructure is currently evolving and making a transition from a centralized to a decentralized system. This paper: (i) compares the Chinese and Indian financial systems to explain differences in the quantum of funds available in cities in both countries; (ii) looks at urban responsibility allocations in terms of institutions; and (iii) compares capital investments made by one city each in the two countries, in Beijing (China) and in Mumbai (India).
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 120
页数:16
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, GLOBALISATION ITS DI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, World development report 2006: Equity and development
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CHIN STAT YB
[4]  
*BRIH MUMB MUN COR, 2003, BUDG EST 200O 04
[5]  
*BRIH MUMB MUN COR, 2004, BUDG EST 2004 05
[6]  
KUNDU A, 2000, INEQUALITY MOBILITY
[7]  
MAHADEVIA D, 2003, POVERTY LEVELS LIVIN
[8]  
MAHADEVIA D, 2003, CHINA URBAN COSTRUCT
[9]  
MAHADEVIA D, 2005, 29 CEPT U SCHOOL PLA
[10]  
MAHADEVIA D, 2002, SPATIOECONOMIC DEV R, V9, P19