Examining the ethical environment in higher education

被引:5
作者
Richardson, Mary [1 ]
Healy, Mary [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AH, England
[2] Univ Roehampton, London, England
关键词
ethical environment; assessment; higher education; formal learning contexts; ACADEMIC INTEGRITY; STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; BUSINESS ETHICS; PLAGIARISM; FACULTY; CODES; PHILOSOPHY; DISHONESTY; BEHAVIOR; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1002/berj.3552
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) across the world have found themselves faced with new challenges on issues of ethics. Much of this has been centred on issues of assessment: plagiarism, buying essays, sharing/lending of previously passed work and the stealing of marked/returned work of others. Institutions still treat academic misconduct as largely a behavioural difficulty rather than an issue of ethics (or education), suggesting that academia places a far greater emphasis on combating new forms of dishonesty than it does on encouraging ethical habits and a healthy ethical environment. To date, the majority of research in this area has examined these forms of academic misconduct from the point of view of the student and/or the university, with the perspective of academics receiving very limited attention. Our hypothesis is that academics are perhaps best placed to provide the education needed to create and sustain an ethical environment, and we argue that being 'ethically aware' is a critical factor in the development of academic competence for all parties. This study adds to existing research in three ways: firstly, by highlighting the importance of an overall framework for an ethical environment within HEIs; secondly, by suggesting an ecological model of key parties (the university, students and academics) with responsibility for this environment in assessment; and thirdly, by including new evidence (generated by a survey of academics) to extend our understanding of their views on these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1104
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Codes of ethics as signals for ethical behavior
    Adams, JS
    Tashchian, A
    Shore, TH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2001, 29 (03) : 199 - 211
  • [2] Allen J., 1998, Journal of Marketing Education, V20, P41, DOI [DOI 10.1177/027347539802000106, 10.1177/027347539802000106]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, J MANAGEMENT ED
  • [4] Arnold K, 2000, SPE PROD FACIL, V15, P1
  • [5] Auger G.A., 2013, Journal Mass Communication Educator, V68, P150, DOI DOI 10.1177/1077695813476953
  • [6] Bailey K., 1994, METHODS SOCIAL RES
  • [7] SNOWBALL SAMPLING - PROBLEMS AND TECHNIQUES OF CHAIN REFERRAL SAMPLING
    BIERNACKI, P
    WALDORF, D
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1981, 10 (02) : 141 - 163
  • [8] Bodkin H., 2017, The Telegraph
  • [9] Brown B.S., 2008, International Journal of Management, V25, P621
  • [10] The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: a qualitative study of faculty views on student plagiarism and Turnitin®
    Bruton, Samuel
    Childers, Dan
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 41 (02) : 316 - 330