Accuracy of five formulae to determine the insertion length of umbilical venous catheters

被引:16
|
作者
Lean, Wei Ling [1 ]
Dawson, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Davis, Peter G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Theda, Christiane [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Thio, Marta [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Womens Hosp, Newborn Res Ctr, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Royal Childrens Hosp, PIPER Neonatal Retrieval Serv Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
COMPLICATIONS; POSITION; LOCALIZATION; ULTRASOUND; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/archdischild-2017-314280
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction Umbilical venous catheter (UVC) placement is a common neonatal procedure. It is important to position the UVC tip accurately at the first attempt to prevent complications and minimise handling. Catheters positioned too low need to be removed, but catheters positioned too high may be withdrawn in a sterile fashion to a safe position. We aimed to determine the precision and accuracy of five published formulae developed to guide UVC placement. Methods This was a prospective observational study. Following UVC insertion, anteroposterior and lateral X-rays were performed to identify catheter tip position. Parameters required to apply the five formulae were recorded. Insertion lengths were then calculated and compared with the gold standard (UVC tip at the level of the diaphragm on the lateral X-ray). They were also used to classify predicted UVC tip position as either correct (UVC tip at or up to 1 cm above the diaphragm), too high or too low. Results Of 118 eligible infants, 70 had the UVC tip in a position where measurements could be used. Their median (IQR) gestational age and weight were 28.5 (26-36) weeks and 1035 (745-2788) g, respectively. The predicted success rate for each formula ranged from 44.9% to 55.7%. A formula based on birth weight had the highest rate of either correct or high position (95.8%). Conclusions Inserting a UVC into a safe position on first attempt is difficult and low tip placement is common. Around half of UVCs need to be manipulated to achieve the desired position.
引用
收藏
页码:F165 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] USE OF UMBILICAL VENOUS CATHETERS - A STUDY OF 100 PATIENTS
    EWING, CK
    DURAND, DJ
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1989, 25 (04) : A214 - A214
  • [42] MULTIPLE-LUMEN UMBILICAL VENOUS CATHETERS - REPLY
    PINHEIRO, JMB
    FISHER, MA
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1992, 121 (03): : 500 - 500
  • [43] Pathophysiological Mechanism of Extravasation via Umbilical Venous Catheters
    Hargitai, Beata
    Toldi, Gergely
    Marton, Tamas
    Ramalingam, Velmurugan
    Ewer, Andrew K.
    Russell, Alison R. Bedford
    PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 22 (04) : 340 - 343
  • [44] RAPID ESTIMATION OF INSERTIONAL LENGTH OF UMBILICAL CATHETERS IN NEWBORNS
    SHUKLA, H
    FERRARA, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1986, 140 (08): : 786 - 788
  • [45] EVALUATION OF GRAPHS FOR INSERTION OF UMBILICAL ARTERY CATHETERS BELOW THE DIAPHRAGM
    ROSENFELD, W
    ESTRADA, R
    JHAVERI, R
    SALAZAR, D
    EVANS, H
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1981, 98 (04): : 627 - 628
  • [46] Air embolism during, insertion of central venous catheters
    Vesely, TM
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (11) : 1291 - 1295
  • [47] PERCUTANEOUS INSERTION OF SUBCLAVIAN VENOUS CATHETERS IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN
    BONVENTRE, EV
    LALLY, KP
    CHWALS, WJ
    HARDIN, WD
    ATKINSON, JB
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1989, 169 (03): : 203 - 205
  • [48] Insertion of central venous catheters by apheresis nurses.
    Pocock, M
    Bishop, L
    BLOOD, 1997, 90 (10) : 4252 - 4252
  • [49] Update on Insertion and Complications of Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis
    Bream, Peter R., Jr.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [50] Insertion of central venous catheters induces a hypercoagulable state
    Ryan, Mark L.
    Thorson, Chad M.
    King, David R.
    Van Haren, Robert M.
    Manning, Ronald J.
    Andrews, David M.
    Livingstone, Alan S.
    Proctor, Kenneth G.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 73 (02): : 385 - 390