Risk factors for readmission after lower extremity bypass in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program

被引:103
作者
Zhang, Jennifer Q. [1 ]
Curran, Thomas [1 ]
McCallum, John C. [1 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
Wyers, Mark C. [1 ]
Hamdan, Allen D. [1 ]
Guzman, Raul J. [1 ]
Schermerhorn, Marc L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
AORTIC-ANEURYSM REPAIR; VETERANS-AFFAIRS; VASCULAR-SURGERY; LATE SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; INFECTION; MORTALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.032
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Readmission is associated with high mortality, morbidity, and cost. We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) to determine risk factors for readmission after lower extremity bypass (LEB). Methods: We identified all patients who received LEB in the 2011 ACS-NSQIP database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of 30-day readmission. We also identified our institutional contribution of LEB patients to the ACS-NSQIP from 2005 to 2011 to determine our institution's rate of readmission and readmission indications. Results: Among 5018 patients undergoing LEB, ACS-NSQIP readmission analysis was performed on 4512, excluding those whose readmission data were unavailable, who suffered a death on index admission, or who remained in the hospital at 30 days. Overall readmission rate was 18%, and readmission rate of those with NSQIP-captured complications was 8%. Multivariable predictors of readmission were dependent functional status (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.79), dyspnea (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.60), cardiac comorbidity (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.84), dialysis dependence (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.05-1.97), obesity (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.53), malnutrition (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.12-1.79), critical limb ischemia operative indication (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.79), and return to the operating room on index admission (OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 6.68-9.60). The most common postdischarge complications occurring in readmitted patients included wound complications (55%), multiple complications (22%), and graft failure (5%). Our institutional data contributed 465 LEB patients to the ACS-NSQIP from 2005 to 2012, with an overall readmission rate of 14%. Unplanned readmissions related to the original LEB (related unplanned) made up 75% of cases. The remainder 25% included readmissions that were planned staged procedures related to the original LEB (related planned, 11%) and admissions for a completely unrelated reason (unrelated unplanned, 14%). The most common readmission indications included wound infection (37%) and graft failure (10%). Readmissions were attributable to NSQIP-captured postdischarge complications in 44% of cases, an additional 44% had a non-NSQIP-defined reason for readmission, and the remainder (12%) included patients admitted for complications described in NSQIP but not meeting strict NSQIP criteria. Conclusions: Readmissions are common after LEB. Optimization of select chronic conditions, closer follow-up of patients in poor health and those who required return to the operating room, and early detection of surgical site infections may improve readmission rates. Our finding that 25% of readmissions after LEB are not procedure related informs the broader discussion of how a readmission penalty affects vascular surgery in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:1331 / 1339
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Ansari M Z, 1995, Aust Health Rev, V18, P63
[2]   THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF INPATIENT CARE AND EARLY READMISSION [J].
ASHTON, CM ;
KUYKENDALL, DH ;
JOHNSON, ML ;
WRAY, NP ;
WU, L .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 122 (06) :415-421
[3]   Early discharge does not increase readmission or mortality after high-risk vascular surgery [J].
Brooke, Benjamin S. ;
Goodney, Philip P. ;
Powell, Richard J. ;
Fillinger, Mark F. ;
Travis, Lori L. ;
Goodman, David C. ;
Cronenwett, Jack L. ;
Stone, David H. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (03) :734-740
[4]   The Evolving Importance of Readmission Data to the Practicing Surgeon [J].
Brown, Russell E. ;
Qadan, Motaz ;
Martin, Robert C. G., II ;
Polk, Hiram C., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (04) :558-560
[5]   Differences in readmissions after open repair versus endovascular aneurysm repair [J].
Casey, Kevin ;
Hernandez-Boussard, Tina ;
Mell, Matthew W. ;
Lee, Jason T. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (01) :89-95
[6]   Postoperative and late survival outcomes after major amputation: Findings from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [J].
Feinglass, J ;
Pearce, WH ;
Martin, GJ ;
Gibbs, J ;
Cowper, D ;
Sorensen, M ;
Henderson, WG ;
Daley, J ;
Khuri, S .
SURGERY, 2001, 130 (01) :21-29
[7]   Thirty-day mortality and late survival with reinterventions and readmissions after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries [J].
Giles, Kristina A. ;
Landon, Bruce E. ;
Cotterill, Philip ;
O'Malley, A. James ;
Pomposelli, Frank B. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 (01) :6-13
[8]   Hospital readmissions following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Gioia, LC ;
Filion, KB ;
Haider, S ;
Pilote, L ;
Eisenberg, MJ .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 19 (01) :35-41
[9]   Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery [J].
Goodney, PP ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Birkmeyer, JD .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (02) :161-167
[10]   Causes and Implications of Readmission After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair [J].
Greenblatt, David Yu ;
Greenberg, Caprice C. ;
Kind, Amy J. H. ;
Havlena, Jeffrey A. ;
Mell, Matthew W. ;
Nelson, Matthew T. ;
Smith, Maureen A. ;
Kent, K. Craig .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (04) :595-605